Research Centre of Applied and Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ann Med. 2020 May-Jun;52(3-4):43-54. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1733648. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Observational and interventional studies have unequivocally demonstrated that "present", i.e. single-occasion, blood pressure is one of the key determinants of cardiovascular disease risk. Over the past two decades, however, numerous publications have suggested that longitudinal blood pressure data and assessment of long-term blood pressure exposure provide incremental prognostic value over present blood pressure. These studies have used several different indices to quantify the overall exposure to blood pressure, such as time-averaged blood pressure, cumulative blood pressure, blood pressure trajectory patterns, and age of hypertension onset. This review summarises existing research on the association between these indices and hard cardiovascular outcomes, outlines the strengths and weaknesses of these indices, and provides an overview of how longitudinal blood pressure changes can be measured and used to improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction.KEY MESSAGESNumerous recent publications have examined the relation between cardiovascular disease and long-term blood pressure (BP) exposure, quantified using indices such as time-averaged BP, cumulative BP, BP trajectory patterns, and age of hypertension onset.This review summarises existing research on the association between these indices and hard cardiovascular outcomes, outlines the strengths and weaknesses of these indices, and provides an overview of how longitudinal BP changes can be measured and used to improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction.Although longitudinal BP indices seem to predict cardiovascular outcomes better than present BP, there are considerable differences in the clinical feasibility of these indices along with a limited number of prospective data.
观察性研究和干预性研究已经明确表明,“当前”(即单次测量的血压)是心血管疾病风险的关键决定因素之一。然而,在过去的二十年中,大量的出版物表明,纵向血压数据和长期血压暴露评估提供了比当前血压更高的预后价值。这些研究使用了几种不同的指标来量化血压的总体暴露情况,例如平均血压、累积血压、血压轨迹模式和高血压发病年龄。
本综述总结了现有关于这些指标与硬性心血管结局之间关系的研究,概述了这些指标的优缺点,并概述了如何测量和使用纵向血压变化来改善心血管疾病风险预测。
关键信息
大量最近的出版物研究了使用平均血压、累积血压、血压轨迹模式和高血压发病年龄等指标量化的长期血压(BP)暴露与心血管疾病之间的关系。
本综述总结了现有关于这些指标与硬性心血管结局之间关系的研究,概述了这些指标的优缺点,并概述了如何测量和使用纵向血压变化来改善心血管疾病风险预测。
虽然纵向 BP 指标似乎比当前 BP 更能预测心血管结局,但这些指标的临床可行性存在很大差异,前瞻性数据也有限。