• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多病因模型分析队列研究和病例对照研究结果的关系

Analyzing the Relationship between Cohort and Case-Control Study Results Based on Model for Multiple Pathogenic Factors.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Immunology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Dec 30;2019:7507043. doi: 10.1155/2019/7507043. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/7507043
PMID:32082409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7012262/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although the relative risk from a prospective cohort study is numerically approximate to the odds ratio from a case-control study for a low-probability event, a definite relationship between case-control and cohort studies cannot be confirmed. In this study, we established a different model to determine the relationship between case-control and cohort studies.

METHODS

Two analysis models (the cross-sectional model and multiple pathogenic factor model) were established. Incidences in both the exposure group and the nonexposure group in a cohort study were compared with the frequency of the observed factor in each group (diseased and nondiseased) in a case-control study.

RESULTS

The relationship between the results of a case-control study and a cohort study is as follows: =()/()/()/(=()/()/()/( and represent the incidence in the exposed group and nonexposed group, respectively, from the cohort study, while and represent the observed frequencies in the disease group and the control group, respectively, for the case-control study; finally, )/(.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a definite relationship between the results of case-control and cohort studies assessing the same exposure. The outcomes of case-control studies can be translated into cohort study data.

摘要

目的

虽然前瞻性队列研究的相对风险在数值上近似于病例对照研究的比值比,但对于低概率事件,不能确定病例对照研究和队列研究之间的关系。本研究建立了一种不同的模型来确定病例对照和队列研究之间的关系。

方法

建立了两种分析模型(横断面模型和多致病因素模型)。将队列研究中暴露组和非暴露组的发生率与病例对照研究中每组(患病和未患病)观察到的因素的频率进行比较。

结果

病例对照研究和队列研究结果之间的关系如下:=()/()/()/(=()/()/()/(和分别代表队列研究中暴露组和非暴露组的发病率,而和分别代表病例对照研究中疾病组和对照组的观察频率;最后,)/(.

结论

评估相同暴露的病例对照研究和队列研究的结果之间存在明确的关系。病例对照研究的结果可以转化为队列研究数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d860/7012262/a6060f297b26/CMMM2019-7507043.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d860/7012262/6e0abba0a4be/CMMM2019-7507043.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d860/7012262/a6060f297b26/CMMM2019-7507043.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d860/7012262/6e0abba0a4be/CMMM2019-7507043.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d860/7012262/a6060f297b26/CMMM2019-7507043.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the Relationship between Cohort and Case-Control Study Results Based on Model for Multiple Pathogenic Factors.基于多病因模型分析队列研究和病例对照研究结果的关系
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Dec 30;2019:7507043. doi: 10.1155/2019/7507043. eCollection 2019.
2
Authors' response: Mezei et al's "Comments on a recent case-control study of malignant mesothelioma of the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis testis".作者回复:Mezei 等人的“对近期心包恶性间皮瘤和睾丸鞘膜病例对照研究的评论”。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):87-89. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3910. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
The case-population study design: an analysis of its application in pharmacovigilance.病例-人群研究设计:在药物警戒中的应用分析。
Drug Saf. 2011 Oct 1;34(10):861-8. doi: 10.2165/11592140-000000000-00000.
4
Risk ratio estimation in case-cohort studies.病例队列研究中的风险比估计。
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Nov;102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):53-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s853.
5
Sample size calculations for prevalent cohort designs.现患队列设计的样本量计算。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):280-291. doi: 10.1177/0962280214544730. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
Visceral adiposity and inflammatory bowel disease.内脏肥胖与炎症性肠病。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2305-2319. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03968-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
7
Limitations of the case-exposure study.病例暴露研究的局限性。
Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):34-8. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00008.
8
Lung cancer risk among female textile workers exposed to endotoxin.暴露于内毒素的女性纺织工人患肺癌的风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Mar 7;99(5):357-64. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk063.
9
Mapping the expanded often inappropriate use of the Framingham Risk Score in the medical literature.绘制弗雷明汉风险评分在医学文献中过度且不恰当应用的图谱。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.021. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
10
A new pathway for considering trigger factors based on parallel-serial connection models and displaying the relationships of causal factors in low-probability events.基于并串联连接模型考虑触发因素的新途径,并显示低概率事件中因果因素的关系。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01919-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A new pathway for considering trigger factors based on parallel-serial connection models and displaying the relationships of causal factors in low-probability events.基于并串联连接模型考虑触发因素的新途径,并显示低概率事件中因果因素的关系。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01919-3.
2
Need for discriminating between diagnostic and screening efficacy to estimate a biomarker based on case control and cohort studies.需要区分基于病例对照和队列研究的诊断和筛查功效来评估生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 17;11(1):22450. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01904-0.

本文引用的文献

1
How to apply evidence-based principles in clinical dentistry.如何在临床牙科中应用循证原则。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 Feb 11;12:131-136. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S189484. eCollection 2019.
2
Elevated Inflammatory Status and Increased Risk of Chronic Disease in Chronological Aging: Inflamm-aging or ?自然衰老过程中炎症状态升高与慢性病风险增加:炎症衰老还是其他?
Aging Dis. 2019 Feb 1;10(1):147-156. doi: 10.14336/AD.2018.0326. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
Crosstalk of Genetic Variants, Allele-Specific DNA Methylation, and Environmental Factors for Complex Disease Risk.
复杂疾病风险的遗传变异、等位基因特异性DNA甲基化和环境因素之间的相互作用
Front Genet. 2019 Jan 9;9:695. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00695. eCollection 2018.
4
Quantifying the effects of aging and urbanization on major gastrointestinal diseases to guide preventative strategies.量化衰老和城市化对主要胃肠道疾病的影响,以指导预防策略。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 3;18(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0872-1.
5
Genetic risk analysis for an individual according to the theory of programmed onset, illustrated by lung and liver cancers.根据程序性发病理论对个体进行遗传风险分析,以肺癌和肝癌为例。
Gene. 2018 Oct 5;673:107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.044. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
6
The CONSORT guidelines for noninferiority trials should be updated to go beyond the absolute risk difference.非劣效性试验的CONSORT指南应进行更新,以超越绝对风险差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:6-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
7
Nonspecific changes in clinical laboratory indicators in unselected terminally ill patients and a model to predict survival time based on a prospective observational study.未选择的终末期患者临床实验室指标的非特异性变化,以及基于前瞻性观察研究的预测生存时间的模型。
J Transl Med. 2014 Mar 22;12:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-78.
8
Screening of cerebral infarction-related genetic markers using a Cox regression analysis between onset age and heterozygosity at randomly selected short tandem repeat loci.采用 Cox 回归分析,基于发病年龄和随机选择的短串联重复序列(STR)杂合度之间的关系,筛选与脑梗死相关的遗传标记物。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 May;33(4):318-21. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0724-8.
9
The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine.证据的级别及其在循证医学中的作用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):305-310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318219c171.
10
Evidence-based medicine and levels of evidence.循证医学与证据等级
Am Orthopt J. 2010;60:2-5. doi: 10.3368/aoj.60.1.2.