Oware Adu-Gyamfi Kwabena, Pant Chaitanya, Deshpande Abhishek, Jassim Hassanain, Olyaee Mojtaba
Department of Internal Medicine, HSHS St. Mary's Hospital Medical Center, Green Bay, WI, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Surg Res Pract. 2020 Jan 28;2020:8072682. doi: 10.1155/2020/8072682. eCollection 2020.
Increased esophagectomy procedures over the past four decades have correlated with the rise in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Despite advances in technology and procedural expertise, esophagectomy remains a high-risk surgical procedure. Higher volume facilities have more experience with esophagectomy and would be expected to have a lower incidence of surgical complications and attendant morbidity and mortality. By analyzing information from a nationwide United States hospital database, we sought to find out if there is a significant difference between facilities stratified by case volume, with regards to 30-day readmission after esophagectomy. The findings of this study indicated that even with a large applied differential, early readmissions did not differ significantly between high- and low-volume centers. Also, analyzed and discussed were any associated demographic and comorbidity factors as they relate to early readmissions after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma across the country. This is the first study to specifically address these variables.
在过去的四十年中,食管切除术数量的增加与食管腺癌发病率的上升相关。尽管技术和手术专业水平有所进步,但食管切除术仍然是一种高风险的外科手术。手术量较大的医疗机构在食管切除术方面有更多经验,预计其手术并发症以及随之而来的发病率和死亡率会更低。通过分析来自美国全国医院数据库的信息,我们试图找出按病例数量分层的医疗机构在食管切除术后30天再入院方面是否存在显著差异。这项研究的结果表明,即使存在很大的应用差异,高手术量中心和低手术量中心之间的早期再入院情况并无显著差异。此外,还分析和讨论了与全国范围内食管腺癌食管切除术后早期再入院相关的任何人口统计学和合并症因素。这是第一项专门针对这些变量的研究。