Suppr超能文献

精神健康问题患者的急性护理体验:综合文献回顾。

Experiences of acute care by persons with mental health problems: An integrative literature review.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Science, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;27(6):789-806. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12624. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Understanding experiences of acute care by persons with mental health problems is vital for improving these experiences through the development of different parts of the care delivery and its facilities. Literature has extensively addressed experiences of persons with mental health problems in acute care settings. Yet, there is a paucity of studies that aggregate and organize these findings in presenting development-oriented solutions for the improvements of these experiences. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Acute care can be understood through patients' experiences of structure (such as setting, staff and resources); process (such as communication and interpersonal relations); and outcome (such as satisfaction and post-discharge well-being and health) and suggests improvements in these domains. The paper illuminates that previous literature has mainly captured negative experiences of acute care by persons with mental health problems, and suggests diverting the focus to the best practices and to seek inspiration from other fields of research. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Attending to the improvement and development of different parts of the acute care might be an important step in improving experiences of persons with mental health problems. For example, improving resource allocation systems and facilities, emphasizing professionalism in encounters with these patients and systematically assessing patient satisfaction during and after visits are important areas that require attention. ABSTRACT: Aim The provision of acute care to persons with mental health problems is challenging due to difficulties in encountering this group and the vulnerability of these persons. Understanding this group's experiences with acute care is thus an important endeavour. The purpose of this review was to critically and systematically identify and assess previous research on experiences of acute care by persons with mental health problems, guided by Donabedian's structure-process-outcome framework (Prospero ID: CRD42019116652). Method and results An integrative literature review was performed, resulting in the identification of 43 studies. The search was conducted using five electronic databases: Web of Science Core, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO. Discussion The review revealed that patients experienced structure components such as setting, staff and resources in a predominantly negative way. A predominately negative picture also emerged of the process components, where, for example, communication and interpersonal relations were represented by negative experiences, with limited positive experiences reported. The outcome components, related to patients' satisfaction and their well-being after discharge, were also predominantly experienced negatively. Implications for practice Using Donabedian's framework of structure, process and outcome allowed us to systematize the literature reviewed, to identify the research gaps and to suggest ways forward for the field's development.

摘要

已知信息:理解精神健康问题患者的急性护理体验对于通过改善护理提供和设施的不同部分来改善这些体验至关重要。文献广泛探讨了精神健康问题患者在急性护理环境中的体验。然而,几乎没有研究将这些发现综合并组织起来,为改善这些体验提出面向发展的解决方案。

本文新增内容:急性护理可以通过患者对结构(如环境、员工和资源)、过程(如沟通和人际关系)以及结果(如满意度以及出院后的幸福感和健康)的体验来理解,并提出在这些领域进行改进。本文阐明,先前的文献主要捕捉了精神健康问题患者对急性护理的负面体验,并建议将重点转移到最佳实践上,并从其他研究领域寻求灵感。

对实践的影响:关注急性护理不同部分的改进和发展可能是改善精神健康问题患者体验的重要步骤。例如,改善资源分配系统和设施,在与这些患者接触时强调专业性,以及在就诊期间和就诊后系统评估患者满意度,都是需要关注的重要领域。

摘要:目的 为精神健康问题患者提供急性护理具有挑战性,因为在遇到这些患者时存在困难,而且这些患者也很脆弱。因此,了解该群体对急性护理的体验是一项重要的工作。本综述的目的是在 Donabedian 的结构-过程-结果框架(Prospero ID:CRD42019116652)指导下,批判性地和系统地识别和评估先前关于精神健康问题患者急性护理体验的研究。

方法和结果:进行了综合文献回顾,共确定了 43 项研究。搜索使用了五个电子数据库:Web of Science Core、PubMed、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO。

讨论:该综述表明,患者主要以负面的方式体验环境、员工和资源等结构组成部分。过程组成部分也呈现出以负面为主的情况,例如,沟通和人际关系以负面体验为代表,报告的积极体验有限。与患者满意度和出院后幸福感相关的结果组成部分也主要以负面的方式体验。

实践意义:使用 Donabedian 的结构、过程和结果框架使我们能够系统地组织所审查的文献,确定研究差距,并为该领域的发展提出前进方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验