Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
École Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montreal, QC, G1K 9E5, Canada.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01109-w.
Timely access in primary health care is one of the key issues facing health systems. Among many interventions developed around the world, advanced access is the most highly recommended intervention designed specifically to improve timely access in primary care settings. Based on greater accessibility linked with patients' relational continuity and informational continuity with a primary care professional or team, this organizational model aims to ensure that patients obtain access to healthcare services at a time and date convenient for them when needed regardless of urgency of demand. Its implementation requires a major organizational change based on reorganizing the practices of all the administrative staff and health professionals. In recent years, advanced access has largely been implemented in primary care organizations. However, despite its wide dissemination, we observe considerable variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of this model across organizations, as well as among professionals working within the same organization. The main objective of this study is to assess the variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of advanced access in teaching primary healthcare clinics across Quebec and to better understand the influence of the contextual factors on this variation and on outcomes.
This study will be based on an explanatory sequential design that includes 1) a quantitative survey conducted in 47 teaching primary healthcare clinics, and 2) a multiple case study using mixed data, contrasted cases (n = 4), representing various implementation profiles and geographical contexts. For each case, semi-structured interviews and focus group will be conducted with professionals and patients. Impact analyses will also be conducted in the four selected clinics using data retrieved from the electronic medical records.
This study is important in social and political context marked by accessibility issues to primary care services. This research is highly relevant in a context of massive media coverage on timely access to primary healthcare and a large-scale implementation of advanced access across Quebec. This study will likely generate useful lessons and support evidence-based practices to refine and adapt the advanced access model to ensure successful implementation in various clinical contexts facing different challenges.
初级卫生保健的及时获得是卫生系统面临的关键问题之一。在世界各地开发的众多干预措施中,高级访问是专门为改善初级保健环境中的及时获得而设计的最受推荐的干预措施。基于与初级保健专业人员或团队的更大可及性以及患者的关系连续性和信息连续性,该组织模式旨在确保患者在需要时随时随地获得医疗保健服务,无论需求的紧迫性如何。其实施需要基于重新组织所有行政人员和卫生专业人员的实践进行重大的组织变革。近年来,高级访问已在初级保健组织中得到广泛实施。然而,尽管它得到了广泛的传播,但我们观察到组织之间以及同一组织内的专业人员之间,该模型的五个指导原则的实施存在相当大的差异。本研究的主要目的是评估魁北克的教学初级保健诊所中高级访问的五个指导原则的实施情况,并更好地理解背景因素对这种变化和结果的影响。
本研究将基于解释性顺序设计,包括 1)在 47 个教学初级保健诊所进行的定量调查,以及 2)使用混合数据、对比案例(n=4)进行的多案例研究,代表各种实施情况和地理背景。对于每个案例,将与专业人员和患者进行半结构化访谈和焦点小组。还将在四个选定的诊所中使用从电子病历中检索到的数据进行影响分析。
在以初级保健服务可及性问题为标志的社会和政治背景下,这项研究非常重要。在及时获得初级保健的大量媒体报道和在魁北克大规模实施高级访问的背景下,这项研究具有高度相关性。这项研究可能会产生有用的经验教训,并支持循证实践,以完善和调整高级访问模型,以确保在面临不同挑战的各种临床背景下成功实施。