Milovic Carlos, Tejos Cristian, Acosta-Cabronero Julio, Özbay Pinar Senay, Schwesser Ferdinand, Marques Jose Pedro, Irarrazaval Pablo, Bilgic Berkin, Langkammer Christian
Department of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Sep;84(3):1624-1637. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28185. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
The 4th International Workshop on MRI Phase Contrast and QSM (2016, Graz, Austria) hosted the first QSM Challenge. A single-orientation gradient recalled echo acquisition was provided, along with COSMOS and the χ STI component as ground truths. The submitted solutions differed more than expected depending on the error metric used for optimization and were generally over-regularized. This raised (unanswered) questions about the ground truths and the metrics utilized.
We investigated the influence of background field remnants by applying additional filters. We also estimated the anisotropic contributions from the STI tensor to the apparent susceptibility to amend the χ ground truth and to investigate the impact on the reconstructions. Lastly, we used forward simulations from the COSMOS reconstruction to investigate the impact noise had on the metric scores.
Reconstructions compared against the amended STI ground truth returned lower errors. We show that the background field remnants had a minor impact in the errors. In the absence of inconsistencies, all metrics converged to the same regularization weights, whereas structural similarity index metric was more insensitive to such inconsistencies.
There was a mismatch between the provided data and the ground truths due to the presence of unaccounted anisotropic susceptibility contributions and noise. Given the lack of reliable ground truths when using in vivo acquisitions, simulations are suggested for future QSM Challenges.
第四届磁共振成像相位对比与定量磁化率成像国际研讨会(2016年,奥地利格拉茨)举办了首届定量磁化率成像挑战赛。提供了单次取向梯度回波采集数据,以及作为真值的COSMOS和χ STI分量。根据用于优化的误差度量标准,提交的解决方案差异比预期的更大,并且通常过度正则化。这引发了关于真值和所使用度量标准的(未得到解答的)问题。
我们通过应用额外的滤波器研究了背景场残余的影响。我们还估计了STI张量对表观磁化率的各向异性贡献,以修正χ真值并研究其对重建的影响。最后,我们利用COSMOS重建的正向模拟来研究噪声对度量分数的影响。
与修正后的STI真值进行比较的重建结果误差更低。我们表明背景场残余对误差影响较小。在不存在不一致性的情况下,所有度量标准都收敛到相同的正则化权重,而结构相似性指数度量标准对这种不一致性更不敏感。
由于存在未考虑的各向异性磁化率贡献和噪声,所提供的数据与真值之间存在不匹配。鉴于在使用体内采集数据时缺乏可靠的真值,建议在未来的定量磁化率成像挑战赛中采用模拟方法。