• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康成年人语言处理过程中性别差异的神经生物学:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The neurobiology of sex differences during language processing in healthy adults: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Aix-Marseille Université, Aix-en-Provence, France.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107404. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107404. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107404
PMID:32087207
Abstract

The neurobiology of sex differences during language processing has been widely investigated in the past three decades. While substantial sex differences have been reported, empirical findings however appear largely equivocal. The present systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis aimed to determine the degree of agreement among studies reporting sex differences in cortical activity during language processing. Irrespective of the modality and the specificity of the language task, sex differences in the BOLD signal or cerebral blood flow was highly inconsistent across fMRI and PET studies. On the temporal side, earlier latency of auditory evoked responses for female compared to male participants were consistently observed in EEG studies during both listening and speaking. Overall, the present review and meta-analysis support the theoretical assumption that there are much more similarities than differences between men and women in the human brain during language processing. Subtle but consistent temporal differences are however observed in the auditory processing of phonetic cues during speech perception and production.

摘要

过去三十年来,人们广泛研究了语言处理过程中性别差异的神经生物学。尽管已经报道了大量的性别差异,但实证研究结果似乎存在很大的分歧。本系统文献回顾和荟萃分析旨在确定报告语言处理过程中皮质活动性别差异的研究之间的一致性程度。无论语言任务的模态和特异性如何,fMRI 和 PET 研究中大脑活动的性别差异在很大程度上不一致。在时间方面,与男性参与者相比,女性参与者在听觉诱发电响应的潜伏期更早,这在听和说的 EEG 研究中均有观察到。总的来说,本综述和荟萃分析支持这样的理论假设,即在语言处理过程中,男性和女性的大脑之间存在更多的相似之处,而不是差异。然而,在言语感知和产生过程中,对语音线索的听觉处理中仍存在细微但一致的时间差异。

相似文献

1
The neurobiology of sex differences during language processing in healthy adults: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.健康成年人语言处理过程中性别差异的神经生物学:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107404. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107404. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.听觉皮层中与刺激相关的激活和与注意相关的调制:功能磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析。
Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
3
[Auditory perception and language: functional imaging of speech sensitive auditory cortex].[听觉感知与语言:言语敏感听觉皮层的功能成像]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2001 Sep;157(8-9 Pt 1):837-46.
4
Sex differences in language asymmetry are age-dependent and small: a large-scale, consonant-vowel dichotic listening study with behavioral and fMRI data.性别在语言侧化上的差异具有年龄依赖性且很小:一项具有行为学和 fMRI 数据的大规模、半元音二分听研究。
Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1910-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
5
Functional MRI of language processing: dependence on input modality and temporal lobe epilepsy.语言处理的功能磁共振成像:对输入方式和颞叶癫痫的依赖性
Epilepsia. 2001 Oct;42(10):1241-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.35500.x.
6
Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.以快速听觉感知作为言语处理基础的证据:一项稀疏时间采样功能磁共振成像研究。
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Nov;20(9):2447-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03687.x.
7
Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.母语者和第二语言者的语音感知识别会以不同方式激活与声学语音处理相关的脑区以及与发音-听觉/口部感觉内部模型相关的脑区。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jul;22(3):1182-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.006.
8
Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production.歌曲与言语:涉及感知和隐性生成的脑区。
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1327-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.036. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
9
Sex differences in subcortical auditory processing only partially explain higher prevalence of language disorders in males.性别差异在皮质下听觉处理中仅部分解释了男性语言障碍患病率更高的现象。
Hear Res. 2020 Dec;398:108075. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108075. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
Phonetic processing areas revealed by sinewave speech and acoustically similar non-speech.由正弦波语音和声学上相似的非语音揭示的语音处理区域。
Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):342-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.029. Epub 2006 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive strategy in verbal fluency: sex differences, menstrual cycle, and menopause effects.语言流畅性中的认知策略:性别差异、月经周期及更年期影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01265-w.
2
Neural correlates of auditory comprehension and integration of sanskrit verse: a functional MRI study.梵文诗句听觉理解与整合的神经关联:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Jan 9;230(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02892-x.
3
Inter-brain synchrony is associated with greater shared identity within naturalistic conversational pairs.
脑间同步与自然主义对话对中更强的共享身份认同相关。
Br J Psychol. 2025 Feb;116(1):170-182. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12743. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
4
The role of minority language bilingualism in spotting agreement attraction errors: Evidence from Italian varieties.少数民族语言双语在发现一致吸引错误中的作用:来自意大利语变体的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0298648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298648. eCollection 2024.
5
Remembering the null hypothesis when searching for brain sex differences.在寻找大脑性别差异时要记住零假设。
Biol Sex Differ. 2024 Feb 9;15(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00585-4.
6
Univariate and multivariate sex differences and similarities in gray matter volume within essential language-processing areas.大脑基本语言处理区灰质体积的单变量和多变量性别差异和相似性。
Biol Sex Differ. 2023 Dec 21;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00575-y.
7
Sex Differences in Low-Level Multisensory Integration in Developmental Dyslexia.发展性阅读障碍中的低水平多感觉整合的性别差异。
J Neurosci. 2024 Jan 17;44(3):e0944232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0944-23.2023.
8
Emojis Are Comprehended Better than Facial Expressions, by Male Participants.男性参与者对表情符号的理解优于面部表情。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(3):278. doi: 10.3390/bs13030278.
9
An auditory processing advantage enables communication in less complex social settings: Signs of an extreme female brain in children and adolescents being assessed for Autism Spectrum Disorders.听觉处理优势有助于在不太复杂的社交环境中进行交流:对患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和青少年进行评估时发现的极端女性大脑迹象。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1068001. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1068001. eCollection 2022.
10
How Does Literacy Affect Speech Processing? Not by Enhancing Cortical Responses to Speech, But by Promoting Connectivity of Acoustic-Phonetic and Graphomotor Cortices.读写能力如何影响言语处理?不是通过增强对言语的皮层反应,而是通过促进声学-语音和书写运动皮层的连通性。
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 23;42(47):8826-8841. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1125-21.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 17.