ICREA-Complex Systems Lab, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Dr. Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (UPF-CSIC), Pg. Maritim 37, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 13;375(1796):20190325. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0325. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
A common trait of complex systems is that they can be represented by means of a network of interacting parts. It is, in fact, the network organization (more than the parts) that largely conditions most higher-level properties, which are not reducible to the properties of the individual parts. Can the topological organization of these webs provide some insight into their evolutionary origins? Both biological and artificial networks share some common architectural traits. They are often heterogeneous and sparse, and most exhibit different types of correlations, such as nestedness, modularity or hierarchical patterns. These properties have often been attributed to the selection of functionally meaningful traits. However, a proper formulation of generative network models suggests a rather different picture. Against the standard selection-optimization argument, some networks reveal the inevitable generation of complex patterns resulting from reuse and can be modelled using duplication-rewiring rules lacking functionality. These give rise to the observed heterogeneous, scale-free and modular architectures. Here, we examine the evidence for tinkering in cellular, technological and ecological webs and its impact in shaping their architecture. Our analysis suggests a serious consideration of the role played by selection as the origin of network topology. Instead, we suggest that the amplification processes associated with reuse might shape these graphs at the topological level. In biological systems, selection forces would take advantage of emergent patterns. This article is part of the theme issue 'Unifying the essential concepts of biological networks: biological insights and philosophical foundations'.
复杂系统的一个共同特征是,它们可以通过相互作用的部分网络来表示。事实上,正是网络组织(而不是部分)在很大程度上决定了大多数更高层次的特性,这些特性不能简化为单个部分的特性。这些网络的拓扑组织能否提供一些关于其进化起源的见解?生物和人工网络都具有一些共同的结构特征。它们通常是异构的和稀疏的,并且大多数表现出不同类型的相关性,例如嵌套性、模块性或层次模式。这些特性通常归因于对功能有意义的特性的选择。然而,生成网络模型的适当表述给出了一个相当不同的图景。与标准的选择-优化论点相反,一些网络揭示了复杂模式的不可避免的产生,这些模式是由于重用而产生的,可以使用缺乏功能的复制重连规则进行建模。这导致了观察到的异构、无标度和模块化结构。在这里,我们研究了细胞、技术和生态网络中的修补作用的证据及其对塑造其结构的影响。我们的分析表明,需要认真考虑选择作为网络拓扑起源的作用。相反,我们认为与重用相关的放大过程可能会在拓扑层面上塑造这些图。在生物系统中,选择力将利用新兴模式。本文是“统一生物网络的基本概念:生物学见解和哲学基础”主题问题的一部分。