Holzinger Andreas, Langs Georg, Denk Helmut, Zatloukal Kurt, Müller Heimo
Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation Medical University Graz Graz Austria.
Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy Computational Imaging Research Lab, Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):e1312. doi: 10.1002/widm.1312. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Explainable artificial intelligence (AI) is attracting much interest in medicine. Technically, the problem of explainability is as old as AI itself and classic AI represented comprehensible retraceable approaches. However, their weakness was in dealing with uncertainties of the real world. Through the introduction of probabilistic learning, applications became increasingly successful, but increasingly opaque. Explainable AI deals with the implementation of transparency and traceability of statistical black-box machine learning methods, particularly deep learning (DL). We argue that there is a need to go beyond explainable AI. To reach a level of we need causability. In the same way that usability encompasses measurements for the quality of use, causability encompasses measurements for the quality of explanations. In this article, we provide some necessary definitions to discriminate between explainability and causability as well as a use-case of DL interpretation and of human explanation in histopathology. The main contribution of this article is the notion of causability, which is differentiated from explainability in that causability is a property of a person, while explainability is a property of a system This article is categorized under: Fundamental Concepts of Data and Knowledge > Human Centricity and User Interaction.
可解释人工智能(AI)在医学领域正引发广泛关注。从技术层面讲,可解释性问题与AI本身一样古老,经典AI代表着可理解的可追溯方法。然而,它们的弱点在于处理现实世界的不确定性。通过引入概率学习,应用程序越来越成功,但也越来越不透明。可解释AI致力于实现统计黑箱机器学习方法(尤其是深度学习,DL)的透明度和可追溯性。我们认为有必要超越可解释AI。为达到一个新的水平,我们需要因果性。就像可用性包含对使用质量的衡量一样,因果性包含对解释质量的衡量。在本文中,我们提供了一些必要的定义,以区分可解释性和因果性,并给出了DL解释和组织病理学中人类解释的一个用例。本文的主要贡献是因果性这一概念,它与可解释性的区别在于,因果性是人的一种属性,而可解释性是系统的一种属性。本文分类如下:数据与知识的基本概念>以人类为中心与用户交互