• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cultural and Environmental Enablers and Barriers to Participation and Retention in Clinical Trials for Cancer Research.癌症研究临床试验中参与和留存的文化及环境促进因素与障碍
EC Pulmonol Respir Med. 2019 Sep;8(9):600-606. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
2
Results from a Theory-Guided Survey to Support Breast Cancer Trial Participation: Barriers, Enablers, and What to Do about them.基于理论指导的支持乳腺癌试验参与度调查结果:障碍、促进因素及应对措施。
Curr Oncol. 2021 May 26;28(3):2014-2028. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030187.
3
Barriers and enablers for the implementation of a hospital communication tool for patient participation: A qualitative study.用于患者参与的医院沟通工具实施的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):1945-1956. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15055. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
4
Supporting Trial Participation in People with the Huntington's Gene: A Patient-Centered, Theory-Guided Survey of Barriers and Enablers.支持亨廷顿基因携带者参与临床试验:一项基于患者为中心、理论指导的对障碍和促进因素的调查。
J Huntingtons Dis. 2022;11(4):421-434. doi: 10.3233/JHD-220541.
5
Community and cultural engagement for people with lived experience of mental health conditions: what are the barriers and enablers?社区和文化参与对有心理健康问题经历的人:有哪些障碍和促进因素?
BMC Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;10(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00775-y.
6
What influences allied health clinician participation in research in the public hospital setting: a qualitative theory-informed approach.哪些因素影响公立医院环境下的专职医疗人员参与研究:一种基于理论的定性研究方法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036183.
7
Discordant attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial participation between physicians, research staff, and cancer patients.医生、研究人员和癌症患者对癌症临床试验参与的态度和信念存在差异。
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):184-194. doi: 10.1177/1740774520901514. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
8
Identifying Enablers of Participant Engagement in Clinical Trials of Consumer Health Technologies: Qualitative Study of Influenza Home Testing.识别消费者健康技术临床试验中参与者参与的促成因素:流感家庭检测的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 14;23(9):e26869. doi: 10.2196/26869.
9
Barriers and Enablers to Organ Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Beliefs of Frontline Intensive Care Unit Professionals and Organ Donor Coordinators.循环判定死亡后器官捐献的障碍与促进因素:一项探索重症监护病房一线专业人员和器官捐献协调员信念的定性研究
Transplant Direct. 2018 Jun 27;4(7):e368. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000805. eCollection 2018 Jul.
10
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Staff Perspectives on Cancer Clinical Trials and Barriers to Recruitment: A Qualitative Research.研究人员对癌症临床试验及招募障碍的看法:一项定性研究
Cureus. 2021 Aug 15;13(8):e17202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17202. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
An integrative Tai Chi program for patients with breast cancer undergoing cancer therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility study.一项针对癌症治疗期间的乳腺癌患者的综合性太极拳项目:一项随机对照可行性研究的研究方案。
J Integr Med. 2018 Mar;16(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
The feasibility of a pragmatic distance-based intervention to increase physical activity in lung cancer survivors.一种基于距离的实用干预措施对增加肺癌幸存者身体活动的可行性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12722. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Feasibility study: home telemonitoring for patients with lung cancer in a mountainous rural area.可行性研究:山区农村肺癌患者的家庭远程监测
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Mar 1;41(2):153-61. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.153-161.
4
Disparities in underserved white populations: the case of cancer-related disparities in Appalachia.服务不足的白人人口中的差异:阿巴拉契亚地区癌症相关差异的案例。
Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1072-81. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0145.
5
Social and cultural factors influencing health in southern West Virginia: a qualitative study.西弗吉尼亚州南部影响健康的社会和文化因素:一项定性研究。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A124. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
6
Appalachia: where place matters in health.阿巴拉契亚:地域对健康至关重要之地。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Oct;3(4):A113. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
7
The Appalachia Cancer Network: cancer control research among a rural, medically underserved population.阿巴拉契亚癌症网络:针对农村医疗服务不足人群的癌症控制研究。
J Rural Health. 2004 Spring;20(2):181-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2004.tb00026.x.
8
Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication.患者与医生对癌症I期临床试验的看法:对医患沟通的启示
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 1;21(13):2589-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.072.

癌症研究临床试验中参与和留存的文化及环境促进因素与障碍

Cultural and Environmental Enablers and Barriers to Participation and Retention in Clinical Trials for Cancer Research.

作者信息

Petitte Trisha, Nichols Allison, Narsavage Georgia

机构信息

School of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Extension Service, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

EC Pulmonol Respir Med. 2019 Sep;8(9):600-606. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

PMID:32090209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7034422/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

West Virginia (WV) residents have often rejected participation in community-based cancer research studies. Nationally, 49% of eligible patients participate in clinical trials but less than 10% of patients in WV participate.

OBJECTIVE

To understand issues related to recruitment and retention of patients for cancer research in Appalachian WV.

METHODS

Data were obtained from 3 focus groups including: (1) 9 patients who participated in clinical cancer trials, (2) 8 cancer research nurse coordinators, and (3) 10 physicians involved in cancer research. Groups were audio-taped and transcriptions were analyzed using MAXQDA and results were verified by two co-investigators.

RESULTS

Most enablers and barriers identified were cultural as indicated by 72% of patients; 68% nurse coordinators; and 55% physicians. Patients identified personal emotional strength as an enabler, and negative health behaviors and fears as barriers. Enablers that nurses identified were positive patient characteristics and barriers included fear of trials, randomization, and death. Physicians identified enablers as a patient's understanding of the clinical trial and motivation to help others and the inverse of these two enablers as barriers.

CONCLUSION

A foundation for improving recruitment and retention of participants in cancer research in Appalachia was identified. The next step will involve cancer community organizations and patients in developing a plan to enhance enablers and overcome barriers to patient recruitment in cancer studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Cultural influences must be considered when recruiting for clinical trials. Community organizations educating the public about cancer research may be the key to enhancing patient enrollment.

摘要

背景

西弗吉尼亚州(WV)居民常常拒绝参与基于社区的癌症研究。在全国范围内,49%符合条件的患者参与临床试验,但WV参与的患者不到10%。

目的

了解西弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区癌症研究中患者招募和留存相关的问题。

方法

数据来自3个焦点小组,包括:(1)9名参与临床癌症试验的患者,(2)8名癌症研究护士协调员,以及(3)10名参与癌症研究的医生。各小组进行了录音,并使用MAXQDA对转录内容进行分析,结果由两名共同研究者核实。

结果

如72%的患者、68%的护士协调员和55%的医生所指出的,大多数已确定的促进因素和障碍是文化方面的。患者将个人情感力量视为促进因素,将负面健康行为和恐惧视为障碍。护士确定的促进因素是患者的积极特征,障碍包括对试验、随机分组和死亡的恐惧。医生将患者对临床试验的理解和帮助他人的动机视为促进因素,而将这两个促进因素的反面视为障碍。

结论

确定了改善阿巴拉契亚地区癌症研究参与者招募和留存的基础。下一步将让癌症社区组织和患者参与制定一项计划,以增强促进因素并克服癌症研究中患者招募的障碍。

实践意义

招募临床试验参与者时必须考虑文化影响。社区组织向公众宣传癌症研究可能是提高患者入组率的关键。