Iudici Antonio, Colombo Lucia, Caravita Simona Carla Silvia, Cottone Paolo, Neri Jessica
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy.
Institute of Psychology and Psychotherapy (Scuola Interazionista), 35100 Padua, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;14(3):155. doi: 10.3390/bs14030155.
The complexity of migration flows across the world has led to a redefinition of psychological and social services users. The access of migrants from different cultural backgrounds to clinical services or social health services has diversified the demand for concomitant help. Biases and misinterpretations have been created by unaccustomed professionals in this field, which could lead to serious consequences and invalidate diagnostic and treatment procedures. The purpose of this study is to summarize the evidence about errors or prejudices observed in clinical practices regarding the provision of social health services to people from different cultural backgrounds. Results show three main types of biases: racial stereotype activation, ethnocentrism and micro-aggressions. Some implications on the clinical setting were discussed, as being aware of these biases can help mental health professionals manage communication more consciously with users.
全球移民流动的复杂性导致了心理和社会服务用户的重新定义。来自不同文化背景的移民获得临床服务或社会健康服务,使得对配套帮助的需求变得多样化。该领域中不熟悉情况的专业人员产生了偏见和误解,这可能导致严重后果,并使诊断和治疗程序无效。本研究的目的是总结在临床实践中观察到的、针对为不同文化背景的人提供社会健康服务时出现的错误或偏见的证据。结果显示出三种主要的偏见类型:种族刻板印象激活、民族中心主义和微侵犯。文中讨论了对临床环境的一些影响,因为意识到这些偏见有助于心理健康专业人员更有意识地与用户进行沟通。