Yedema C, Massuger L, Hilgers J, Servaas J, Poels L, Thomas C, Kenemans P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer Suppl. 1988;3:61-7. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910410813.
Serum levels of CA125 and CA15.3 were measured in 70 patients presenting with an ovarian neoplasm, of whom 38 had an ovarian malignancy and 32 a benign ovarian tumor. CA125 levels exceeded 35 U/ml in 71% of ovarian carcinomas and in 25% of benign ovarian tumors. In the entire group of 70 patients, CA125 levels (greater than 35 U/ml) were elevated in 35 patients, of whom 27 had ovarian cancer. CA15.3 levels were found to be elevated (greater than 30 U/ml) in 9% of benign ovarian tumors and in 50% of ovarian malignancies. Of 8 patients with a false positive CA125 (greater than 35) elevation, only one had an elevated CA15.3 level whereas in 27 correct positive patients 19 also had elevated CA15.3 levels. Of all 20 patients with both markers elevated, 19 patients (95%) had ovarian cancer. When a cut-off level of 65 U/ml was used for the tumor marker CA125, all patients with simultaneous elevation of both markers were found to have an ovarian malignancy. Using a panel of CA125 (greater than 35 U/ml) and CA15.3 (greater than 30 U/ml) and requiring a simultaneous marker elevation, the sensitivity of the test decreased from 71% to 50% but the corresponding specificity of the test rose from 75% to 97%. Specificity was as high as 100% if in the same panel of tests a 65 U/ml cut-off for CA125 was taken. A comparison of early stage I-II ovarian cancer with benign ovarian tumors failed to demonstrate a discriminatory capacity of any test or test combination. We conclude that the use of a panel of tumor markers is advantageous in the pre-operative discrimination of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, since the predictive value for malignancy of a combined marker elevation was as high as 100% in the population studied.
对70例卵巢肿瘤患者测定了血清CA125和CA15.3水平,其中38例为卵巢恶性肿瘤,32例为卵巢良性肿瘤。71%的卵巢癌患者CA125水平超过35 U/ml,25%的卵巢良性肿瘤患者CA125水平超过35 U/ml。在70例患者的整个队列中,35例患者CA125水平(大于35 U/ml)升高,其中27例患有卵巢癌。9%的卵巢良性肿瘤患者和50%的卵巢恶性肿瘤患者CA15.3水平升高(大于30 U/ml)。在8例CA125假阳性(大于35)升高的患者中,只有1例CA15.3水平升高,而在27例真阳性患者中,19例CA15.3水平也升高。在所有20例两种标志物均升高的患者中,19例(95%)患有卵巢癌。当肿瘤标志物CA125的临界值设定为65 U/ml时,发现所有两种标志物同时升高的患者均患有卵巢恶性肿瘤。使用CA125(大于35 U/ml)和CA15.3(大于30 U/ml)组合并要求两种标志物同时升高时,检测的敏感性从71%降至50%,但相应的特异性从75%升至97%。如果在同一检测组合中CA125的临界值设定为65 U/ml,则特异性高达100%。早期I-II期卵巢癌与卵巢良性肿瘤的比较未能显示任何检测或检测组合的鉴别能力。我们得出结论,使用一组肿瘤标志物有利于术前鉴别卵巢良性和恶性肿瘤,因为在所研究的人群中,联合标志物升高对恶性肿瘤的预测价值高达100%。