Suppr超能文献

野火期间的室内与室外空气质量

Indoor versus Outdoor Air Quality during Wildfires.

作者信息

Messier K P, Tidwell L G, Ghetu C C, Rohlman D, Scott R P, Bramer L M, Dixon H M, Waters K M, Anderson K A

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, United States of America.

College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, United States of America.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019 Dec 10;6(12):696-701. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00599. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

Abstract

The human behavioral modification recommendations during wildfire events are based on particulate matter and may be confounded by the potential risks of gas-phase pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Moreover, the majority of adults spend over 90 percent of their time indoors where there is an increased concern of indoor air quality during wildfire events. We address these timely concerns by evaluating paired indoor and outdoor PAH concentrations in residential locations and their relationship with satellite model-based categorization of wildfire smoke intensity. Low-density polyethylene passive air samplers were deployed at six urban sites for 1 week in Eugene, Oregon with matched indoor and outdoor samples and 24 h time resolution. Samples were then quantitatively analyzed for 63 PAH concentrations using gas-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A probabilistic principal components analysis was used to reduce all 63 PAHs into an aggregate measure. Linear regression of the first principal component against indoor versus outdoor shows that indoor gas-phase PAH concentrations are consistently equal to or greater than outdoor concentrations. Regression against a satellite-based model for wildfire smoke shows that outdoor, but not indoor gas-phase PAH concentrations are likely associated with wildfire events. These results point toward the need to include gas-phase pollutants such as PAHs in air pollution risk assessment.

摘要

野火事件期间的人类行为改变建议基于颗粒物,可能会被多环芳烃(PAHs)等气相污染物的潜在风险所混淆。此外,大多数成年人90%以上的时间都待在室内,在野火事件期间,室内空气质量问题备受关注。我们通过评估住宅地点室内和室外PAH的配对浓度及其与基于卫星模型的野火烟雾强度分类之间的关系,来解决这些紧迫问题。在俄勒冈州尤金市的六个城市地点部署了低密度聚乙烯被动空气采样器,为期1周,采集配对的室内和室外样本,时间分辨率为24小时。然后使用气相色谱-串联质谱法对样本进行63种PAH浓度的定量分析。采用概率主成分分析将所有63种PAHs归纳为一个综合指标。第一个主成分与室内和室外的线性回归表明,室内气相PAH浓度始终等于或高于室外浓度。与基于卫星的野火烟雾模型的回归表明,室外气相PAH浓度可能与野火事件有关,但室内气相PAH浓度并非如此。这些结果表明,在空气污染风险评估中需要纳入PAHs等气相污染物。

相似文献

1
Indoor versus Outdoor Air Quality during Wildfires.野火期间的室内与室外空气质量
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2019 Dec 10;6(12):696-701. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00599. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Wildfire Impact on Indoor and Outdoor PAH Air Quality.野火对室内和室外多环芳烃空气质量的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jul 19;56(14):10042-10052. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00619. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

3
7
PM Is Insufficient to Explain Personal PAH Exposure.个人微粒物质暴露情况难以单纯用颗粒物质量浓度来解释。
Geohealth. 2024 Feb 10;8(2):e2023GH000937. doi: 10.1029/2023GH000937. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

2
Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk.美国城乡交错带的快速发展增加了野火风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 27;115(13):3314-3319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718850115. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.天然气开采过程中多环芳烃向大气的排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7921-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02762. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.野火烟雾暴露对健康影响的批判性综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Sep;124(9):1334-43. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409277. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
Health impacts of wildfires.野火对健康的影响。
PLoS Curr. 2012 Nov 2;4:e4f959951cce2c. doi: 10.1371/4f959951cce2c.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验