Quas Jodi A, Dickerson Kelli L
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, 4201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA 92697-7085, USA.
Int J Child Maltreat. 2019 Dec;2(4):239-254. doi: 10.1007/s42448-019-00031-8. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
In recent years, increasing efforts have been focused on testing strategies of improving victimized children's narrative productivity, given that, for many youth, finding out what has happened to them is crucial to intervening and promoting their well-being. Implicit encouragement strategies, such as back channeling by conversational partners, have shown some preliminary promise, but their precise effects on productivity and accuracy have not been adequately examined. In this study, 98 youth, ages 8-14, completed a laboratory-based stressful activity, and a week later, a surprise memory test regarding what happened in the lab activity. Interviewers varied their use of implicit encouragement. Open-ended recall questions asked youth about both factual details and detail about their feelings and thoughts during the laboratory activity. Implicit encouragement increased the amount of both types of details and had no effect on errors. In fact, few youth provided any incorrect information in their recall reports. Neither age nor stress was related to youth's productivity or accuracy, directly or in conjunction with implicit encouragement. Results highlight the value of interviewers using encouraging behaviors when questioning children and adolescents to elicit a range of information about prior stressful experiences.
近年来,越来越多的努力集中在测试提高受伤害儿童叙事能力的策略上,因为对许多青少年来说,弄清楚他们遭遇了什么对于干预和促进他们的幸福至关重要。诸如对话伙伴进行反馈等隐性鼓励策略已显示出一些初步成效,但它们对叙事能力和准确性的确切影响尚未得到充分研究。在本研究中,98名年龄在8至14岁的青少年完成了一项基于实验室的压力活动,一周后,针对实验室活动中发生的事情进行了一次突击记忆测试。访谈者改变了他们对隐性鼓励的运用。开放式回忆问题询问青少年关于事实细节以及他们在实验室活动期间的感受和想法的细节。隐性鼓励增加了这两类细节的数量,并且对错误率没有影响。事实上,很少有青少年在他们的回忆报告中提供任何错误信息。年龄和压力与青少年的叙事能力或准确性均无直接关联,也不存在与隐性鼓励相结合的关联。研究结果凸显了访谈者在询问儿童和青少年时使用鼓励行为以获取有关先前压力经历的一系列信息的价值。