Wocial Lucia D, Slaven James E, Montz Kianna, Monahan Patrick O, Hickman Susan E, Callahan Christopher M, Helft Paul R, Sachs Greg A, Inger Lev, Burke Emily S, Torke Alexia M
Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, IU Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1405-1412. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05652-1. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
When working with surrogate decision-makers, physicians often encounter ethical challenges that may cause moral distress which can have negative consequences for physicians.
To determine frequency of and factors associated with physicians' moral distress caring for patients requiring a surrogate.
Prospective survey.
Physicians (n = 154) caring for patients aged 65 years and older and their surrogate decision-makers (n = 362 patient/surrogate dyads). Patients were admitted to medicine or medical intensive care services, lacked decisional capacity and had an identified surrogate.
Moral distress thermometer.
Physicians experienced moral distress in the care of 152 of 362 patients (42.0%). In analyses adjusted for physician, patient, and surrogate characteristics, physician/surrogate discordance in preferences for the plan of care was not significantly associated with moral distress. Physicians were more likely to experience moral distress when caring for older patients (1.06, 1.02-1.10), and facing a decision about life-sustaining treatment (3.58, 1.54-8.32). Physicians were less likely to experience moral distress when caring for patients residing in a nursing home (0.40, 0.23-0.69), patients who previously discussed care preferences (0.56, 0.35-0.90), and higher surrogate ratings of emotional support from clinicians (0.94, 0.89-0.99). Physicians' internal discordance when they prefer a more comfort-focused plan than the patient is receiving was associated with significantly higher moral distress (2.22, 1.33-3.70) after adjusting for patient, surrogate, and physician characteristics.
Physician moral distress occurs more frequently when the physician is male, the patient is older or requires decisions about life-sustaining treatments. These findings may help target interventions to support physicians. Prior discussions about patient wishes is associated with lower distress and may be a target for patient-centered interventions.
在与替代决策者合作时,医生经常会遇到伦理挑战,这些挑战可能会导致道德困扰,而这可能会给医生带来负面后果。
确定医生在照顾需要替代者的患者时道德困扰的频率及相关因素。
前瞻性调查。
照顾65岁及以上患者的医生(n = 154)及其替代决策者(n = 362对患者/替代者)。患者入住内科或医疗重症监护病房,缺乏决策能力且有确定的替代者。
道德困扰温度计。
在362名患者中,有152名患者(42.0%)的护理过程中医生经历了道德困扰。在对医生、患者和替代者特征进行调整的分析中,医生/替代者在护理计划偏好上的不一致与道德困扰无显著关联。当照顾老年患者时(1.06,1.02 - 1.10)以及面临维持生命治疗的决策时(3.58,1.54 - 8.32),医生更有可能经历道德困扰。当照顾住在养老院的患者时(0.40,0.23 - 0.69)、之前讨论过护理偏好的患者时(0.56,0.35 - 0.90)以及替代者对临床医生情感支持的评分较高时(0.94,0.89 - 0.99),医生经历道德困扰的可能性较小。在对患者、替代者和医生特征进行调整后,当医生倾向于比患者正在接受的更注重舒适的计划时,医生内心的不一致与显著更高的道德困扰相关(2.22,1.33 - 3.70)。
当医生为男性、患者年龄较大或需要做出维持生命治疗的决策时,医生的道德困扰更频繁发生。这些发现可能有助于确定支持医生的干预目标。关于患者意愿的事先讨论与较低的困扰相关,可能是以患者为中心的干预措施的目标。