• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生在为住院成人进行代理决策方面的经验。

Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.

机构信息

Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1023-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y. Epub 2009 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y
PMID:19633896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2726893/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients frequently lack decision-making ability, yet little is known about physicians' approaches to surrogate decision making.

OBJECTIVE

To describe physicians' experiences with surrogate communication and decision making for hospitalized adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional written survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for adult inpatients in one academic and two community hospitals.

MEASUREMENTS

Key features of physicians' most recent surrogate decision-making experience, including the nature of the decision, the physician's reaction, physician-surrogate communication and physician-surrogate agreement about the best course of action.

RESULTS

Nearly three fourths of physicians (73%, n = 206) had made a major decision with a surrogate during the past month. Although nearly all patients (90%) had a surrogate, physicians reported trouble contacting the surrogate in 21% of cases. Conflict was rare (5%), and a majority of physicians agreed with surrogates about the medical facts (77%), prognosis (72%) and best course of action (65%). After adjustment for patient, physician and decision characteristics, agreement about the best course of action was more common among surrogates for older patients [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.17 for each decade; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.31], ICU patients (PR = 1.40; CI 1.14-1.51) and patients who had previously discussed their wishes (PR = 1.60; CI 1.30-1.76), and less common when surrogates were difficult to contact (PR = 0.59; CI 0.29-0.92) or when the physician self-identified as Asian (PR = 0.60; CI 0.30-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Surrogate decision making is common among hospitalized adults. Physician-surrogate decision making may be enhanced if patients discuss their preferences in advance and if physician contact with surrogate decision makers is facilitated.

摘要

背景

住院患者通常缺乏决策能力,但人们对医生在代理决策方面的做法知之甚少。

目的

描述医生在为住院成人进行代理沟通和决策方面的经验。

设计

横断面书面调查。

参与者

在一家学术医院和两家社区医院最近照顾成年住院患者的 281 名医生。

测量

医生最近的代理决策经验的关键特征,包括决策的性质、医生的反应、医生与代理人的沟通以及医生与代理人对最佳行动方案的共识。

结果

近四分之三的医生(73%,n=206)在过去一个月内与代理人一起做出了重大决策。尽管几乎所有患者(90%)都有代理人,但医生报告说在 21%的情况下难以联系到代理人。冲突很少见(5%),大多数医生对代理人在医疗事实(77%)、预后(72%)和最佳行动方案(65%)上的看法表示赞同。在调整了患者、医生和决策特征后,对于老年患者(每十年患病率比[PR]为 1.17;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.02-1.31)、ICU 患者(PR=1.40;CI 为 1.14-1.51)和之前讨论过自己意愿的患者(PR=1.60;CI 为 1.30-1.76),代理人更有可能达成一致意见,而对于难以联系代理人的患者(PR=0.59;CI 为 0.29-0.92)或医生自我认同为亚洲人的患者(PR=0.60;CI 为 0.30-0.94),则不太常见。

结论

在住院成人中,代理决策很常见。如果患者事先讨论他们的偏好,并且方便医生与代理人决策制定者联系,那么医生与代理人的决策可能会得到改善。

相似文献

1
Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults.医生在为住院成人进行代理决策方面的经验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep;24(9):1023-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1065-y. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
2
Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making.医生对患者偏好在代理决策中重要性的看法。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):533-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
3
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.为住院老年人做决策:家庭代理人考虑的伦理因素。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34.
4
Doubt and belief in physicians' ability to prognosticate during critical illness: the perspective of surrogate decision makers.对医生在危重病期间进行预后判断能力的怀疑与信任:替代决策者的观点。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug;36(8):2341-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180ddf9.
5
The Influence of Surrogate Decision Makers on Clinical Decision Making for Critically Ill Adults.替代决策者对危重症成年患者临床决策的影响
J Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;30(5):278-85. doi: 10.1177/0885066613516597. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
6
Communicating with clinicians: the experiences of surrogate decision-makers for hospitalized older adults.与临床医生沟通:住院老年患者的代理人的经验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1401-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04086.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
7
Role of written advance directives in decision making: insights from qualitative and quantitative data.书面预先指示在决策中的作用:来自定性和定量数据的见解
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jul;13(7):439-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00132.x.
8
Prevalence of and Factors Related to Discordance About Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients.重症患者的医生和代理人在预后方面存在分歧的流行率及相关因素。
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2086-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5351.
9
Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults.住院老年患者中代理决策的范围和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):370-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315.
10
Critical care physicians' approaches to negotiating with surrogate decision makers: a qualitative study.重症监护医师与代理人决策人协商的方法:一项定性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1080-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823c8d21.

引用本文的文献

1
Tough Clinical Decisions: Experiences of Polish Physicians.艰难的临床决策:波兰医生的经验。
HEC Forum. 2024 Mar;36(1):111-130. doi: 10.1007/s10730-022-09491-x. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
2
Factors Associated with Physician Moral Distress Caring for Hospitalized Elderly Patients Needing a Surrogate Decision-maker: a Prospective Study.与照顾需要代理决策者的住院老年患者的医生道德困扰相关的因素:一项前瞻性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1405-1412. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05652-1. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Are older and seriously ill inpatients planning ahead for future medical care?高龄和重病住院患者是否为未来的医疗保健进行规划?
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2.
4
Increasing advance personal planning: the need for action at the community level.加强预先个人规划:社区层面需要采取行动。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 9;18(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5523-5.
5
Survey on German Palliative Care Specialists' Experiences with Advance Directives.德国姑息治疗专家关于预立医疗指示的经验调查。
Pain Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0063-0. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
6
Advance Directives and Communication Skills of Prehospital Physicians Involved in the Care of Cardiovascular Patients.参与心血管疾病患者救治的院前医师的预立医疗指示与沟通技巧
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(49):e2112. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002112.
7
Surrogate decision makers and proxy ownership: challenges of privacy management in health care decision making.替代决策者与代理所有权:医疗保健决策中隐私管理的挑战。
Health Commun. 2015;30(8):799-809. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.900528. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
8
Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults.住院老年患者中代理决策的范围和结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):370-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315.
9
Features and outcomes of patients who underwent cardiac device deactivation.接受心脏装置去激活术患者的特征和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan;174(1):80-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11564.
10
Making decisions for hospitalized older adults: ethical factors considered by family surrogates.为住院老年人做决策:家庭代理人考虑的伦理因素。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):125-34.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians.重新思考替代决策的伦理框架:一项针对医生的定性研究
J Clin Ethics. 2008 Summer;19(2):110-9.
2
Attitudes and preferences of Korean-American older adults and caregivers on end-of-life care.韩裔美国老年人及其照顾者对临终关怀的态度和偏好。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1867-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01394.x. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
3
Surviving surrogate decision-making: what helps and hampers the experience of making medical decisions for others.幸存的替代决策:哪些因素有助于或阻碍为他人做出医疗决策的体验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1274-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0252-y. Epub 2007 Jul 7.
4
The physician-surrogate relationship.医生与代理人的关系。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 11;167(11):1117-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.11.1117.
5
A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU.一份针对在重症监护病房(ICU)死亡患者亲属的沟通策略及手册。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446.
6
Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors.临床实践中的伦理困境:欧洲医生的经历。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jan;33(1):51-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014266.
7
Beyond substituted judgment: How surrogates navigate end-of-life decision-making.超越替代判断:代理人如何进行临终决策。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Nov;54(11):1688-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00911.x.
8
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review.替代决策者的准确性:一项系统综述。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 13;166(5):493-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.493.
9
Attitudes of Asian-Indian Hindus toward end-of-life care.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jan;53(1):131-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53025.x.
10
Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者家属出现创伤后应激症状的风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC. Epub 2005 Jan 21.