Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Center for Autism Research Excellence, Boston University, 100 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Oct;50(10):3699-3713. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04421-7.
Although pragmatic speech impairments have been found across the autism spectrum, how these manifest in minimally verbal (MV) individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has not been studied. We compared the pragmatic speech profiles of MV (n = 50) and verbally fluent (VF) individuals with ASD (n = 50; 6-21 years-old) based on natural language sampling during the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2. MV individuals with ASD primarily used their speech to agree/acknowledge/disagree, respond to a question, and request. In contrast, the primary pragmatic function used by VF individuals was commenting. Out of the total non-echolalic speech, groups did not differ proportionally in labeling and response to questions. Findings highlight the importance of investigating multiple aspects of pragmatic communication across different conversational partners and contexts.
尽管在自闭症谱系中发现了实用言语障碍,但自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 中语言能力极低的个体(MV 个体)中这些障碍的表现方式尚未得到研究。我们根据自闭症诊断观察量表-2 中的自然语言采样,比较了 50 名 MV 个体(年龄 6-21 岁)和 50 名言语流畅个体(VF 个体)的实用言语特征。患有 ASD 的 MV 个体主要使用言语来表示同意/承认/不同意、回答问题和请求。相比之下,VF 个体的主要实用言语功能是评论。在非模仿性言语中,各组在标签和对问题的反应方面没有按比例差异。研究结果强调了在不同对话伙伴和情境下研究多个方面的实用言语交际的重要性。