Suppr超能文献

全面学校体育活动计划政策与实践调查问卷(CSPAP-Q)。

Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program Policies and Practices Questionnaire (CSPAP-Q).

机构信息

University of West Georgia.

University of Northern Colorado.

出版信息

Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Mar;92(1):100-110. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1711008. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

Abstract

: The Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) model has recently been adopted as a national framework for physical activity (PA) promotion in schools. As a result, there is a need to develop an instrument to help leaders of PA measure policies and practices across the five component areas of a CSPAP. To address this gap, our team systematically developed and assessed the psychometric properties of the CSPAP-Q, an instrument designed to assess school policies and practices related to the five components of CSPAP. : The instrument development process began by reviewing existing school health and PA surveys. The Delphi method was then used to evaluate face and content validity through expert feedback. Thirty-eight physical education teachers completed the CSPAP-Q twice over a 14-day period to further establish validity and to assess test-retest reliability. : In total, 117 items were identified for the initial review. Upon completion of expert feedback, 22 items were eliminated and 66 items were revised. After reliability testing, three additional items were eliminated due to low test-retest agreement levels (Kappa <.40; non-significant χ). Ninety-two items were retained in the final version of the CSPAP-Q and kappa values indicated moderate to substantial agreement among items. : After validity and reliability testing, results suggest that the CSPAP-Q is a valid and reliable tool for assessing policies and practices related to CSPAP.

摘要

全面学校体育活动计划(CSPAP)模式最近已被采纳为学校体育活动(PA)促进的国家框架。因此,需要开发一种工具来帮助 PA 的领导者衡量 CSPAP 的五个组成部分的政策和实践。为了解决这一差距,我们的团队系统地开发并评估了 CSPAP-Q 的心理测量特性,这是一种旨在评估与 CSPAP 的五个组成部分相关的学校政策和实践的工具。

工具的开发过程始于审查现有的学校健康和 PA 调查。然后,通过专家反馈,使用德尔菲法评估表面和内容效度。38 名体育教师在 14 天内两次完成 CSPAP-Q,以进一步建立有效性,并评估测试-重测信度。

总共确定了 117 个项目进行初步审查。在完成专家反馈后,删除了 22 个项目,修订了 66 个项目。在可靠性测试后,由于测试-重测协议水平较低(Kappa <.40;无显著性 χ),又删除了三个项目。最终版本的 CSPAP-Q 保留了 92 个项目,项目之间的 Kappa 值表明存在中度至显著的一致性。

在有效性和可靠性测试后,结果表明 CSPAP-Q 是一种评估与 CSPAP 相关的政策和实践的有效且可靠的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验