Social Science Department, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, 100 College Place, Lyman Hall Rm 309, Syracuse, NY, USA.
School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, 1101 Philippines; Congressional Policy and Budget Research Department, 3F Main Building, House of Representatives, Batasan Hills, Quezon City, 1126 Philippines.
Prev Med. 2020 May;134:106042. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106042. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
The Philippine tobacco excise tax reform law passed in 2012 drastically increased cigarette prices which were historically low. A pack of 20 cigarettes costing nine cents (US Dollar) or less was taxed five cents in 2011. When the reform took effect in 2013, each pack was taxed 24 cents which is almost five times the 2011 rate. Alongside the increase in tax is a decline in the prevalence of tobacco use from 28.3% in 2009 to 23.8% in 2015. Seven years since the reform took effect, policymakers are still debating whether the tax introduced was high enough to significantly reduce smoking prevalence. This study estimated the total price elasticity of cigarette demand using regression analyses on the pooled Philippine 2009 and 2015 Global Adult Tobacco Survey data with the excise tax as an instrumental variable. Information from both tax regimes provided the variation in cigarette prices that allowed for the estimation of the price elasticity of smoking participation and intensity. Age, sex, urban residence, educational attainment, employment status, wealth quintile, and media exposure were used as control variables. Results confirm that cigarette demand is inelastic, given that total cigarette price elasticity of demand ranges from -0.56 to -1.10 which means that for every 10% price increase, total cigarette demand declines by 5.6% to 11.0%. This study also provides total price elasticities for different subpopulations. Future studies can use these elasticity estimates to forecast smoking prevalence and provide policy recommendations.
2012 年,菲律宾通过了烟草消费税改革法案,大幅提高了历史低价香烟的价格。2011 年,每包 20 支装香烟售价在 9 美分(约合人民币 0.6 元)或以下的需征收 5 美分的税。2013 年改革生效后,每包香烟需征收 24 美分的税,几乎是 2011 年税率的 5 倍。随着税收的增加,烟草使用的流行率从 2009 年的 28.3%下降到 2015 年的 23.8%。自改革实施 7 年后,政策制定者仍在争论引入的税收是否足以显著降低吸烟率。本研究使用回归分析,利用菲律宾 2009 年和 2015 年全球成人烟草调查数据的汇总数据,并将消费税作为工具变量,估计了香烟需求的总价格弹性。两个税收制度的信息提供了香烟价格的变化,从而可以估计吸烟参与度和强度的价格弹性。年龄、性别、城市居住、教育程度、就业状况、财富五分位数和媒体接触被用作控制变量。结果证实,香烟需求缺乏弹性,因为香烟总需求价格弹性的范围在-0.56 到-1.10 之间,这意味着香烟价格每上涨 10%,香烟总需求就会下降 5.6%到 11.0%。本研究还提供了不同亚人群的总价格弹性。未来的研究可以使用这些弹性估计值来预测吸烟流行率并提供政策建议。