• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用高分辨率 LiDAR DEM 进行土墩识别和提取的地形地貌方法。

Geomorphometric Methods for Burial Mound Recognition and Extraction from High-Resolution LiDAR DEMs.

机构信息

Department of Geography, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 700505 Iași, Romania.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;20(4):1192. doi: 10.3390/s20041192.

DOI:10.3390/s20041192
PMID:32098135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7070870/
Abstract

Archaeological topography identification from high-resolution DEMs (Digital Elevation Models) is a current method that is used with high success in archaeological prospecting of wide areas. I present a methodology through which burial mounds (tumuli) from LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) DEMS can be identified. This methodology uses geomorphometric and statistical methods to identify with high accuracy burial mound candidates. Peaks, defined as local elevation maxima are found as a first step. In the second step, local convexity watershed segments and their seeds are compared with positions of local peaks and the peaks that correspond or have in vicinity local convexity segments seeds are selected. The local convexity segments that correspond to these selected peaks are further fed to a Random Forest algorithm together with shape descriptors and descriptive statistics of geomorphometric variables in order to build a model for the classification. Multiple approaches to tune and select the proper training dataset, settings, and variables were tested. The validation of the model was performed on the full dataset where the training was performed and on an external dataset in order to test the usability of the method for other areas in a similar geomorphological and archaeological setting. The validation was performed against manually mapped, and field checked burial mounds from two neighbor study areas of 100 km each. The results show that by training the Random Forest on a dataset composed of between 75% and 100% of the segments corresponding to burial mounds and ten times more non-burial mounds segments selected using Latin hypercube sampling, 93% of the burial mound segments from the external dataset are identified. There are 42 false positive cases that need to be checked, and there are two burial mound segments missed. The method shows great promise to be used for burial mound detection on wider areas by delineating a certain number of tumuli mounds for model training.

摘要

从高分辨率数字高程模型 (DEM) 进行考古地形识别是当前在大面积考古勘探中使用的一种非常成功的方法。我提出了一种通过 LiDAR (光探测与测量) DEM 识别土冢(坟墓)的方法。该方法使用地形和统计方法来准确识别土冢候选物。首先找到定义为局部高程最大值的山峰。在第二步中,将局部凸分水岭段及其种子与局部峰的位置进行比较,选择与局部凸分水岭段对应的峰或附近有局部凸分水岭段种子的峰。将与这些选择的峰对应的局部凸分水岭段进一步输入到随机森林算法中,并结合地形形态变量的形状描述符和描述性统计数据,以便为分类建立模型。测试了多种方法来调整和选择合适的训练数据集、设置和变量。模型的验证是在进行训练的完整数据集和外部数据集上进行的,以测试该方法在类似地形和考古环境的其他地区的可用性。验证是针对从两个相邻的研究区域手动绘制并现场检查的土冢进行的,每个区域的面积为 100 公里。结果表明,通过在由对应于土冢的段组成的数据集上训练随机森林,并且使用拉丁超立方采样选择十倍以上的非土冢段,能够识别外部数据集中 93%的土冢段。有 42 个假阳性的情况需要检查,还有两个土冢段被遗漏。该方法有望通过划定一定数量的土冢进行模型训练,在更大的范围内用于土冢检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/7e1c9b7b8fc0/sensors-20-01192-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/882601c8c37e/sensors-20-01192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/38338c2d5a31/sensors-20-01192-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/8fe25e5d0f7e/sensors-20-01192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/eb29830aee92/sensors-20-01192-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/3abbecb33cb7/sensors-20-01192-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/9972b00aa6f2/sensors-20-01192-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/9f5f1a29017d/sensors-20-01192-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/0f0af51c5fa5/sensors-20-01192-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e5c5a8d9fe45/sensors-20-01192-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e7374473284c/sensors-20-01192-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/2b9872fa1a44/sensors-20-01192-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/0ae39c98b652/sensors-20-01192-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/c0ffb59a2df8/sensors-20-01192-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/942fc55ff7f5/sensors-20-01192-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e816ce90a945/sensors-20-01192-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a3364646f006/sensors-20-01192-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a9537a056581/sensors-20-01192-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/c842bd5cae0e/sensors-20-01192-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a9be9bd1e7f2/sensors-20-01192-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/7e1c9b7b8fc0/sensors-20-01192-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/882601c8c37e/sensors-20-01192-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/38338c2d5a31/sensors-20-01192-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/8fe25e5d0f7e/sensors-20-01192-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/eb29830aee92/sensors-20-01192-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/3abbecb33cb7/sensors-20-01192-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/9972b00aa6f2/sensors-20-01192-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/9f5f1a29017d/sensors-20-01192-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/0f0af51c5fa5/sensors-20-01192-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e5c5a8d9fe45/sensors-20-01192-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e7374473284c/sensors-20-01192-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/2b9872fa1a44/sensors-20-01192-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/0ae39c98b652/sensors-20-01192-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/c0ffb59a2df8/sensors-20-01192-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/942fc55ff7f5/sensors-20-01192-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/e816ce90a945/sensors-20-01192-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a3364646f006/sensors-20-01192-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a9537a056581/sensors-20-01192-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/c842bd5cae0e/sensors-20-01192-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/a9be9bd1e7f2/sensors-20-01192-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/198e/7070870/7e1c9b7b8fc0/sensors-20-01192-g020.jpg

相似文献

1
Geomorphometric Methods for Burial Mound Recognition and Extraction from High-Resolution LiDAR DEMs.利用高分辨率 LiDAR DEM 进行土墩识别和提取的地形地貌方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;20(4):1192. doi: 10.3390/s20041192.
2
Curriculum learning-based strategy for low-density archaeological mound detection from historical maps in India and Pakistan.基于课程学习的策略,用于从印度和巴基斯坦的历史地图中探测低密度考古土丘。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 12;13(1):11257. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38190-x.
3
Temporal variability in shell mound formation at Albatross Bay, northern Australia.澳大利亚北部信天翁湾贝丘形成的时间变异性。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183863. eCollection 2017.
4
Dissecting and Interpreting a Three-Dimensional Ground-Penetrating Radar Dataset: An Example from Northern Australia.剖析与解读三维探地雷达数据集:来自澳大利亚北部的实例。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 12;19(5):1239. doi: 10.3390/s19051239.
5
The role of mound functions and local environment in the diversity of termite mound structures.蚁丘功能和局部环境在白蚁丘结构多样性中的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2021 Oct 21;527:110823. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110823. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
LightGBM hybrid model based DEM correction for forested areas.基于 LightGBM 混合模型的森林地区 DEM 校正。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 7;19(10):e0309025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309025. eCollection 2024.
7
Shaping pre-modern digital terrain models: The former topography at Charlemagne's canal construction site.塑造前现代数字地形模型:查理曼运河施工现场的前地形。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0200167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200167. eCollection 2018.
8
Odontometric determination of sex at Mound 72, Cahokia.齿科测量学在卡霍基亚 72 号墩的性别鉴定。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013 Jul;151(3):408-19. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22282. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Geomorpho90m, empirical evaluation and accuracy assessment of global high-resolution geomorphometric layers.全球高分辨率地貌计量层的地貌 90m,经验评估和精度评估。
Sci Data. 2020 May 28;7(1):162. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0479-6.
10
Explanation of the influence of geomorphometric variables on the landform classification based on selected areas in Poland.基于波兰选定区域的地貌几何变量对地形分类影响的解释。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56066-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effectiveness of a UAV-Based LiDAR Survey to Develop Digital Terrain Models and Topographic Texture Analyses.基于无人机的激光雷达测量在开发数字地形模型和地形纹理分析方面的有效性。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jul 14;23(14):6415. doi: 10.3390/s23146415.

本文引用的文献

1
Using archaeological and geomorphological evidence for the establishment of a relative chronology and evolution pattern for Holocene landslides.利用考古学和地貌学证据建立全新世滑坡的相对年代学和演化模式。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 31;14(12):e0227335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227335. eCollection 2019.
2
Integrating Remote Sensing and Geophysics for Exploring Early Nomadic Funerary Architecture in the "Siberian Valley of the Kings".整合遥感与地球物理学以探索“西伯利亚帝王谷”早期游牧丧葬建筑
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 11;19(14):3074. doi: 10.3390/s19143074.
3
A Random Forests Quantile Classifier for Class Imbalanced Data.
用于类别不平衡数据的随机森林分位数分类器。
Pattern Recognit. 2019 Jun;90:232-249. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.01.036. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
4
Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms.图像分析中的形态学灰度重建:应用与高效算法。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 1993;2(2):176-201. doi: 10.1109/83.217222.