Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, University of Western Ontario, FNB 2302, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON, N6A 5C1, Canada.
School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8152-8.
Responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) and its consequences is made complex by women's diverse needs, priorities and contexts. Tailored online IPV interventions that account for differences among women have potential to reduce barriers to support and improve key outcomes.
Double blind randomized controlled trial of 462 Canadian adult women who experienced recent IPV randomly were assigned to receive either a tailored, interactive online safety and health intervention (iCAN Plan 4 Safety) or a static, non-tailored version of this tool. Primary (depressive symptoms, PTSD symptoms) and secondary (helpfulness of safety actions, confidence in safety planning, mastery, social support, experiences of coercive control, and decisional conflict) outcomes were measured at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months later via online surveys. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to test for differences in outcomes by study arm. Differential effects of the tailored intervention for 4 strata of women were examined using effect sizes. Exit survey process evaluation data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests and conventional content analysis.
Women in both tailored and non-tailored groups improved over time on primary outcomes of depression (p < .001) and PTSD (p < .001) and on all secondary outcomes. Changes over time did not differ by study arm. Women in both groups reported high levels of benefit, safety and accessibility of the online interventions, with low risk of harm, although those completing the tailored intervention were more positive about fit and helpfulness. Importantly, the tailored intervention had greater positive effects for 4 groups of women, those: with children under 18 living at home; reporting more severe violence; living in medium-sized and large urban centers; and not living with a partner.
This trial extends evidence about the effectiveness of online safety and health interventions for women experiencing IPV to Canadian women and provides a contextualized understanding about intervention processes and effects useful for future refinement and scale up. The differential effects of the tailored intervention found for specific subgroups support the importance of attending to diverse contexts and needs. iCAN is a promising intervention that can complement resources available to Canadian women experiencing IPV.
Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02258841 (Prospectively Registered on Oct 2, 2014).
应对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)及其后果的复杂性在于女性的多样化需求、优先事项和背景。考虑到女性之间的差异而量身定制的在线 IPV 干预措施有可能减少对支持的障碍,并改善关键结果。
对 462 名最近经历过 IPV 的加拿大成年女性进行了双盲随机对照试验,这些女性被随机分配接受定制的互动式在线安全和健康干预(iCAN Plan 4 Safety)或该工具的静态、非定制版本。通过在线调查在基线和 3、6 和 12 个月后测量主要(抑郁症状、创伤后应激症状)和次要(安全行为的帮助、安全规划信心、掌握、社会支持、强制性控制的经验以及决策冲突)结果。使用广义估计方程测试研究臂之间结果的差异。使用效应大小检查针对 4 个女性群体的定制干预的差异效果。使用描述性统计、t 检验和常规内容分析分析退出调查过程评估数据。
定制组和非定制组的女性在抑郁(p<0.001)和创伤后应激(p<0.001)的主要结果以及所有次要结果上都随着时间的推移而改善。随着时间的推移,研究臂之间没有差异。两组女性都报告说,在线干预措施具有很高的益处、安全性和可及性,风险很低,尽管完成定制干预的女性对适合性和有用性的评价更高。重要的是,定制干预对 4 组女性有更大的积极影响,这些女性是:有 18 岁以下子女同住的;报告更严重暴力的;居住在中等和大城市中心的;以及没有与伴侣同住的。
本试验将在线安全和健康干预措施对经历 IPV 的加拿大女性的有效性扩展到了加拿大女性,并提供了对干预过程和效果的背景理解,这对未来的改进和扩大规模很有用。针对特定亚组发现的定制干预的差异效果支持关注不同背景和需求的重要性。iCAN 是一种很有前途的干预措施,可以补充加拿大遭受 IPV 的女性现有的资源。
Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT02258841(于 2014 年 10 月 2 日前瞻性注册)。