Hoyt Lindsay T, Niu Li, Pachucki Mark C, Chaku Natasha
Applied Developmental Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Sociology & Computational Social Science Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Feb 4;10:100549. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100549. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Puberty is marked by substantial increases and emerging sex differences in psychological disorders and risky behaviors. However, few studies have examined these effects beyond adolescence, and the previous literature has been dominated by samples of White girls. The current study examines the broadest known set of health sequelae related to traditional pubertal markers and peer-relative pubertal timing in a representative sample of 14,545 U.S. youth from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Maturational timing was assessed by age at menarche for girls and physical development for boys (e.g., facial hair, voice change), and then categorized as early (1 SD below mean), on-time, or late (1 SD above mean) within-sex. Early and late peer-relative timing was assessed by a self-report of looking "much older" or "much younger" than one's peers. We examined psychological (depressive symptoms, antisocial behavior), behavioral (number of sex partners, drug use, physical activity, screen time, sleep hours), and physical health (self-reported health, BMI) outcomes during adolescence and young adulthood in a series of sex-stratified regression analyses using survey weights and a comprehensive set of sociodemographic covariates. Results indicated that, overall, earlier pubertal timing (i.e., maturational timing and peer-relative timing) put both girls and boys at risk during adolescence, while later timing was protective. However, longitudinal models revealed mixed results. For instance, early maturational timing was associated with higher young adult BMI (girls: β = 0.139, < .01; boys: β = 0.107, < .01), but later timing for boys was associated with both risky (e.g., more screen time; β = 0.125, < .05) and health promoting (e.g., more sleep; β = .296, < .01) behaviors. Analysis of this holistic set of outcomes with sex differences in mind allows for more careful evidence-based recommendations for adolescent health promotion.
青春期的特点是心理障碍和危险行为大幅增加,且出现性别差异。然而,很少有研究考察这些影响在青春期之后的情况,而且以往的文献主要以白人女孩为样本。本研究在美国青少年健康纵向研究的14545名美国青少年代表性样本中,考察了与传统青春期标志和同龄人相对青春期时间相关的最广泛的已知健康后果。成熟时间通过女孩的初潮年龄和男孩的身体发育(如面部毛发、嗓音变化)来评估,然后在性别内分为早(低于平均水平1个标准差)、准时或晚(高于平均水平1个标准差)。早和晚的同龄人相对时间通过自我报告看起来比同龄人“大得多”或“小得多”来评估。我们在一系列性别分层回归分析中,使用调查权重和一套全面的社会人口学协变量,考察了青少年期和青年期的心理(抑郁症状、反社会行为)、行为(性伴侣数量、药物使用、体育活动、屏幕时间、睡眠时间)和身体健康(自我报告的健康状况、体重指数)结果。结果表明,总体而言,青春期较早的时间(即成熟时间和同龄人相对时间)使女孩和男孩在青春期都面临风险,而较晚的时间则具有保护作用。然而,纵向模型显示结果不一。例如,较早的成熟时间与较高的青年期体重指数相关(女孩:β = 0.139,p <.01;男孩:β = 0.107,p <.01),但男孩较晚的时间与危险行为(如更多屏幕时间;β = 0.125,p <.05)和促进健康行为(如更多睡眠;β =.296,p <.01)都相关。考虑到性别差异对这一整套结果进行分析,有助于为青少年健康促进提供更谨慎的循证建议。