Suppr超能文献

随机试验:左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭患者的治疗目标与指南指导的药物治疗的比较。SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device(SweVAD)试验的原理和设计。

Randomized trial of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy versus guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Rationale and design of the SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) trial.

机构信息

Departments of Cardiology and Transplantation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Departments of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;22(4):739-750. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1773. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

AIMS

Patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF) who are ineligible for heart transplantation (HTx) can become candidates for treatment with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in some countries, but not others. This reflects the lack of a systematic analysis of the usefulness of LVAD systems in this context, and of their benefits, limitations and cost-effectiveness. The SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) study is a Phase IV, prospective, 1:1 randomized, non-blinded, multicentre trial that will examine the impact of assignment to mechanical circulatory support with guideline-directed LVAD destination therapy (GD-LVAD-DT) using the HeartMate 3 (HM3) continuous flow pump vs. guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on survival in a population of AdHF patients ineligible for HTx.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients will be recruited to SweVAD at the seven university hospitals in Sweden. The study population will comprise patients with AdHF (New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6) who display signs of poor prognosis despite GDMT and who are not considered eligible for HTx. Participants will be followed for 2 years or until death occurs. Other endpoints will be determined by blinded adjudication. Patients who remain on study-assigned interventions beyond 2 years will be asked to continue follow-up for outcomes and adverse events for up to 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The SweVAD study will compare survival, medium-term benefits, costs and potential hazards between GD-LVAD-DT and GDMT and will provide a valuable reference point to guide destination therapy strategies for patients with AdHF ineligible for HTx.

摘要

目的

在一些国家,不适合心脏移植(HTx)的晚期心力衰竭(AdHF)患者可以成为左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗的候选者,但在其他国家则不行。这反映了缺乏对 LVAD 系统在这种情况下的有用性及其益处、局限性和成本效益的系统分析。瑞典左心室辅助装置评估(SweVAD)研究是一项四期、前瞻性、1:1 随机、非盲、多中心试验,将研究将机械循环支持与指南指导的 LVAD 目标治疗(GD-LVAD-DT)(使用 HeartMate 3 [HM3] 连续流泵)与指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)对 HTx 不合格的 AdHF 患者人群的生存影响。

方法

将在瑞典的七所大学医院招募总共 80 名患者参加 SweVAD。研究人群将包括患有 AdHF(纽约心脏协会 IIIB-IV 级,INTERMACS 谱 2-6)的患者,这些患者尽管接受了 GDMT,但预后不佳,并且不被认为适合 HTx。参与者将被随访 2 年或直至死亡。其他终点将由盲法裁决确定。如果患者在 2 年以上继续接受研究分配的干预措施,则将要求他们继续随访 5 年,以了解结局和不良事件。

结论

SweVAD 研究将比较 GD-LVAD-DT 和 GDMT 之间的生存率、中期获益、成本和潜在危害,并为不适合 HTx 的 AdHF 患者的目标治疗策略提供有价值的参考点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验