Suppr超能文献

非医师提供者对爱荷华州初级保健空间可达性的影响。

Impact of nonphysician providers on spatial accessibility to primary care in Iowa.

机构信息

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):476-485. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13280. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of nonphysician providers on measures of spatial access to primary care in Iowa, a state where physician assistants and advanced practice registered nurses are considered primary care providers.

DATA SOURCES

2017 Iowa Health Professions Inventory (Carver College of Medicine), and minor civil division (MCD) level population data for Iowa from the American Community Survey.

STUDY DESIGN

We used a constrained optimization model to probabilistically allocate patient populations to nearby (within a 30-minute drive) primary care providers. We compared the results (across 10 000 scenarios) using only primary care physicians with those including nonphysician providers (NPPs). We analyze results by rurality and compare findings with current health professional shortage areas.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Physicians and NPPs practicing in primary care in 2017 were extracted from the Iowa Health Professions Inventory.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Considering only primary care physicians, the average unallocated population for primary care was 222 109 (7 percent of Iowa's population). Most of the unallocated population (86 percent) was in rural areas with low population density (< 50/square mile). The addition of NPPs to the primary care workforce reduced unallocated population by 65 percent to 78 252 (2.5 percent of Iowa's population). Despite the majority of NPPs being located in urban areas, most of the improvement in spatial accessibility (78 percent) is associated with sparsely populated rural areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of nonphysician providers greatly reduces but does not eliminate all areas of inadequate spatial access to primary care.

摘要

目的

评估爱荷华州非医师提供者对初级保健空间可达性措施的影响,在该州,医师助理和高级执业注册护士被视为初级保健提供者。

数据来源

2017 年爱荷华州卫生专业人员名录(卡弗医学院)和美国社区调查的爱荷华州小行政区(MCD)级人口数据。

研究设计

我们使用约束优化模型,以概率方式将患者人群分配到附近(30 分钟车程内)的初级保健提供者。我们将仅使用初级保健医生的结果(在 10000 个场景中)与包括非医师提供者(NPP)的结果进行比较。我们按农村地区进行分析,并将调查结果与当前卫生专业人员短缺地区进行比较。

数据收集/提取方法:从爱荷华州卫生专业人员名录中提取 2017 年从事初级保健工作的医生和 NPP。

主要发现

仅考虑初级保健医生,初级保健未分配的平均人口为 222109 人(占爱荷华州人口的 7%)。未分配人口(86%)主要集中在人口密度低(<50/平方英里)的农村地区。将 NPP 添加到初级保健劳动力中,可将未分配的人口减少 65%,至 78252 人(占爱荷华州人口的 2.5%)。尽管大多数 NPP 位于城市地区,但空间可达性的改善(78%)主要与人口稀少的农村地区有关。

结论

纳入非医师提供者大大减少了,但并未消除所有初级保健空间可达性不足的地区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206e/7240764/d667de137be4/HESR-55-476-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验