Lisak D, Roth S
Duke University.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Nov;55(5):795-802. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.5.795.
Research on convicted rapists has demonstrated the importance of several key motivational factors in male sexual aggression. In particular, anger at women and the need to dominate or control them have been repeatedly implicated. Although anger and power have also been shown to be important in understanding college men who report sexually aggressive behavior, there has been little research on what underlies these motives. This research combined questions assessing these underlying motivational factors, as well as questions dealing with underlying sexual motivation and disinhibition, with a slightly modified version of the Sexual Experiences Survey (Koss & Oros, 1982). In Study 1, subjects were 184 male undergraduates. Factor analysis of the questions composing the four scales yielded four slightly modified scales. Scales measuring underlying anger, underlying power, and disinhibition significantly differentiated sexually aggressive from nonaggressive men but did not distinguish between men who were coercive, manipulative, or nonaggressive. In a replication on a smaller sample (n = 70), underlying anger, underlying power, and disinhibition again differentiated sexually aggressive from nonaggressive men.
对已定罪强奸犯的研究表明了男性性侵犯中几个关键动机因素的重要性。特别是，对女性的愤怒以及支配或控制她们的需求一再被提及。虽然愤怒和权力在理解报告有性侵犯行为的大学男生方面也被证明很重要，但对于这些动机的潜在因素却鲜有研究。本研究将评估这些潜在动机因素的问题，以及处理潜在性动机和抑制解除的问题，与经过略微修改的《性经历调查》（科斯和奥罗斯，1982年）相结合。在研究1中，受试者为184名男性本科生。对构成四个量表的问题进行因素分析，得出了四个略有修改的量表。测量潜在愤怒、潜在权力和抑制解除的量表显著区分了性侵犯男性和非性侵犯男性，但没有区分强制性、操纵性或非侵犯性的男性。在一个较小样本（n = 70）的重复研究中，潜在愤怒、潜在权力和抑制解除再次区分了性侵犯男性和非性侵犯男性。
