• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于差异治疗效果的正则化结果加权亚组识别

Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.

作者信息

Xu Yaoyao, Yu Menggang, Zhao Ying-Qi, Li Quefeng, Wang Sijian, Shao Jun

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):645-53. doi: 10.1111/biom.12322. Epub 2015 May 11.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12322
PMID:25962845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5395466/
Abstract

To facilitate comparative treatment selection when there is substantial heterogeneity of treatment effectiveness, it is important to identify subgroups that exhibit differential treatment effects. Existing approaches model outcomes directly and then define subgroups according to interactions between treatment and covariates. Because outcomes are affected by both the covariate-treatment interactions and covariate main effects, direct modeling outcomes can be hard due to model misspecification, especially in presence of many covariates. Alternatively one can directly work with differential treatment effect estimation. We propose such a method that approximates a target function whose value directly reflects correct treatment assignment for patients. The function uses patient outcomes as weights rather than modeling targets. Consequently, our method can deal with binary, continuous, time-to-event, and possibly contaminated outcomes in the same fashion. We first focus on identifying only directional estimates from linear rules that characterize important subgroups. We further consider estimation of comparative treatment effects for identified subgroups. We demonstrate the advantages of our method in simulation studies and in analyses of two real data sets.

摘要

当治疗效果存在显著异质性时,为便于进行比较性治疗选择,识别出具有不同治疗效果的亚组非常重要。现有方法直接对结果进行建模,然后根据治疗与协变量之间的相互作用来定义亚组。由于结果受到协变量 - 治疗相互作用和协变量主效应的双重影响,直接对结果进行建模可能会因模型设定错误而变得困难,尤其是在存在许多协变量的情况下。另一种方法是直接进行差异治疗效果估计。我们提出了一种方法,该方法近似一个目标函数,其值直接反映对患者的正确治疗分配。该函数使用患者结果作为权重而非建模目标。因此,我们的方法能够以相同方式处理二元、连续、事件发生时间以及可能受污染的结果。我们首先专注于仅从表征重要亚组的线性规则中识别方向性估计。我们进一步考虑对已识别亚组的比较治疗效果进行估计。我们在模拟研究和对两个真实数据集的分析中展示了我们方法的优势。

相似文献

1
Regularized outcome weighted subgroup identification for differential treatment effects.用于差异治疗效果的正则化结果加权亚组识别
Biometrics. 2015 Sep;71(3):645-53. doi: 10.1111/biom.12322. Epub 2015 May 11.
2
Optimal treatment assignment to maximize expected outcome with multiple treatments.通过多种治疗方法进行最佳治疗分配以最大化预期结果。
Biometrics. 2018 Jun;74(2):506-516. doi: 10.1111/biom.12811. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
Evaluating Flexible Modeling of Continuous Covariates in Inverse-Weighted Estimators.评估逆加权估计中连续协变量的灵活建模。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;188(6):1181-1191. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz004.
4
A Bayesian credible subgroups approach to identifying patient subgroups with positive treatment effects.一种用于识别具有积极治疗效果的患者亚组的贝叶斯可信亚组方法。
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/biom.12522. Epub 2016 May 9.
5
A comparative study of subgroup identification methods for differential treatment effect: Performance metrics and recommendations.亚组识别方法在差异化治疗效果中的比较研究:性能指标与建议。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3658-3678. doi: 10.1177/0962280217710570. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Simulation of correlated continuous and categorical variables using a single multivariate distribution.使用单一多元分布对相关连续变量和分类变量进行模拟。
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2006 Dec;33(6):773-94. doi: 10.1007/s10928-006-9033-1. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
7
Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.第1部分. 多种空气污染成分影响的统计学习方法
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):5-50.
8
Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models.协变量自适应偏倚硬币随机化和广义线性模型下检验的有效性
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):960-9. doi: 10.1111/biom.12062. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Causal inference in longitudinal comparative effectiveness studies with repeated measures of a continuous intermediate variable.具有连续中间变量重复测量的纵向比较效果研究中的因果推断。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 10;33(20):3509-27. doi: 10.1002/sim.6120. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
10
Bayesian credible subgroup identification for treatment effectiveness in time-to-event data.贝叶斯可信亚组识别在生存时间数据中的治疗效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 26;15(2):e0229336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229336. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian Nonparametric Model for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects With Zero-Inflated Data.用于零膨胀数据的异质治疗效果的贝叶斯非参数模型
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5968-5982. doi: 10.1002/sim.10266. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
BioPred: an R package for biomarkers analysis in precision medicine.BioPred:精准医学中用于生物标志物分析的 R 包。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Oct 1;40(10). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae592.
3
High-dimensional Iterative Causal Forest (hdiCF) for Subgroup Identification Using Health Care Claims Data.使用医疗保健理赔数据进行亚组识别的高维迭代因果森林(hdiCF)
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae322.
4
Estimation and inference on high-dimensional individualized treatment rule in observational data using split-and-pooled de-correlated score.使用拆分合并去相关得分对观察性数据中的高维个体化治疗规则进行估计和推断。
J Mach Learn Res. 2022;23.
5
Iterative Causal Forest: A Novel Algorithm for Subgroup Identification.迭代因果森林:一种新的亚组识别算法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 May 7;193(5):764-776. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad219.
6
A Tutorial for Propensity Score Weighting for Moderation Analysis With Categorical Variables: An Application Examining Smoking Disparities Among Sexual Minority Adults.类别变量的调节分析的倾向评分加权教程:应用于检验性少数成年人吸烟差异
Med Care. 2023 Dec 1;61(12):836-845. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001922. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
7
The Oncology Biomarker Discovery framework reveals cetuximab and bevacizumab response patterns in metastatic colorectal cancer.肿瘤生物标志物发现框架揭示西妥昔单抗和贝伐单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的反应模式。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 4;14(1):5391. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41011-4.
8
Machine Learning Models for the Identification of Prognostic and Predictive Cancer Biomarkers: A Systematic Review.机器学习模型在预后和预测性癌症生物标志物识别中的应用:系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;24(9):7781. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097781.
9
Estimating individualized treatment effects from randomized controlled trials: a simulation study to compare risk-based approaches.从随机对照试验中估计个体化治疗效果:比较基于风险的方法的模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01889-6.
10
A reference-free R-learner for treatment recommendation.一种用于治疗推荐的无参考 R-learner。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):404-424. doi: 10.1177/09622802221144326. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Penalized Q-Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimens.用于动态治疗方案的惩罚性Q学习
Stat Sin. 2015 Jul;25(3):901-920. doi: 10.5705/ss.2012.364.
2
New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.用于估计最优动态治疗方案的新统计学习方法。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):583-598. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.937488.
3
Statistical issues in the validation of prognostic, predictive, and surrogate biomarkers.预后、预测和替代生物标志物验证中的统计学问题。
Clin Trials. 2013 Oct;10(5):647-52. doi: 10.1177/1740774513497125. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
4
Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.定性交互树:一种用于识别定性治疗亚组交互作用的工具。
Stat Med. 2014 Jan 30;33(2):219-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.5933. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes using an adaptive m-out-of-n bootstrap scheme.使用自适应n选m自助法对最优动态治疗方案进行推断。
Biometrics. 2013 Sep;69(3):714-23. doi: 10.1111/biom.12052. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
6
A framework for the analysis of heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research.患者中心结局研究中治疗效果异质性分析框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):818-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.009. Epub 2013 May 4.
7
Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.从分类角度估计最优治疗方案。
Stat. 2012 Jan 1;1(1):103-114. doi: 10.1002/sta.411.
8
Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.使用结果加权学习估计个体化治疗规则。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2012 Sep 1;107(449):1106-1118. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2012.695674.
9
Non-Concave Penalized Likelihood with NP-Dimensionality.具有NP维数的非凹惩罚似然法
IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2011 Aug;57(8):5467-5484. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2011.2158486.
10
Adaptive Confidence Intervals for the Test Error in Classification.分类中测试误差的自适应置信区间
J Am Stat Assoc. 2011 Sep 1;106(495):904-913. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm1005.