Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Apr;29(4):880-886. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0963. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
The FDA is considering a mandated reduction in the nicotine content of cigarettes. Clinical trials have been limited by non-study cigarette use (noncompliance), which could mask compensation. The goal of this study was to assess whether compensation occurs when smokers provided with very low nicotine cigarettes cannot access normal nicotine cigarettes.
In a within-subjects, crossover design, current smokers ( = 16) were confined to a hotel for two 4-night hotel stays during which they were only able to access the research cigarettes provided. The hotel stays offered normal nicotine cigarettes or very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes, in an unblinded design, available for "purchase" via a study bank.
In the context of complete compliance with the study cigarettes ( = 16), there was not a significant increase during the VLNC condition for cigarettes smoked per day, expired carbon monoxide, or N-acetyl-S-(cyanoethyl)-l-cysteine (cyanoethyl-MA, metabolite of acrylonitrile). There was a significant nicotine × time interaction on urine N-acetyl-S-(3-hydroxypropyl)-l-cysteine (hydroxypropyl-MA, metabolite of acrolein), driven by an increase in the VLNC condition during the first 24 hours. By the end of the VLNC condition, there was no evidence of compensation across any measure of smoking or smoke exposure.
Among current smokers who exclusively used VLNC cigarettes for 4 days, there was no significant compensatory smoking behavior.
These data, combined with the larger body of work, suggest that a mandated reduction in nicotine content is unlikely to result in an increase in smoking behavior to obtain more nicotine.
FDA 正在考虑强制降低香烟中的尼古丁含量。临床试验受到非研究用香烟(即不符合要求)的影响,这可能掩盖了补偿现象。本研究旨在评估当提供给吸烟者极低尼古丁香烟而无法获得正常尼古丁香烟时,是否会发生补偿现象。
在一项基于个体的交叉设计中,当前吸烟者(n=16)被限制在酒店内,进行两次为期 4 晚的酒店住宿,在此期间,他们只能使用提供的研究香烟。在非盲设计中,酒店住宿提供正常尼古丁香烟或极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟,可通过研究银行“购买”。
在完全遵守研究香烟的情况下(n=16),VLNC 条件下每天吸烟量、呼出的一氧化碳或 N-乙酰-S-(氰乙基)-l-半胱氨酸(丙烯腈的代谢物氰乙基-MA)并没有显著增加。尿 N-乙酰-S-(3-羟基丙基)-l-半胱氨酸(丙烯醛的代谢物羟基丙基-MA)的尼古丁×时间交互作用显著,这是由 VLNC 条件下前 24 小时的增加所驱动的。在 VLNC 条件结束时,没有任何吸烟或烟雾暴露的衡量标准显示出补偿现象。
在连续 4 天仅使用 VLNC 香烟的当前吸烟者中,没有明显的补偿性吸烟行为。
这些数据,结合更大的研究范围,表明强制降低尼古丁含量不太可能导致为获取更多尼古丁而增加吸烟行为。