Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Department of Family Medicine and Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, 20 College Road, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1480-9.
A rapidly ageing population with increasing prevalence of chronic disease presents policymakers the urgent task of tailoring healthcare services to optimally meet changing needs. While healthcare needs-based segmentation is a promising approach to efficiently assessing and responding to healthcare needs at the population level, it is not clear how available schemes perform in the context of community-based surveys administered by non-medically trained personnel. The aim of this prospective cohort, community setting study is to evaluate 4 segmentation schemes in terms of practicality and predictive validity for future health outcomes and service utilization.
A cohort was identified from a cross-sectional health and social characteristics survey of Singapore public rental housing residents aged 60 years and above. Baseline survey data was used to assign individuals into segments as defined by 4 predefined population segmentation schemes developed in Singapore, Delaware, Lombardy and North-West London. From electronic data records, mortality, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and specialist outpatient clinic visits were assessed for 180 days after baseline segment assignment and compared to segment membership for each segmentation scheme.
Of 1324 residents contacted, 928 agreed to participate in the survey (70% response). All subjects could be assigned an exclusive segment for each segmentation scheme. Individuals in more severe segments tended to have lower quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D Index for health utility. All population segmentation schemes were observed to exhibit an ability to differentiate different levels of mortality and healthcare utilization.
It is practical to assign individuals to healthcare needs-based population segments through community surveys by non-medically trained personnel. The resulting segments for all 4 schemes evaluated in this way have an ability to predict health outcomes and utilization over the medium term (180 days), with significant overlap for some segments. Healthcare needs-based segmentation schemes which are designed to guide action hold particular promise for promoting efficient allocation of services to meet the needs of salient population groups. Further evaluation is needed to determine if these schemes also predict responsiveness to interventions to meet needs implied by segment membership.
人口老龄化速度加快,慢性病患病率不断上升,这使得政策制定者迫切需要调整医疗服务,以最佳满足不断变化的需求。虽然基于医疗需求的细分是一种很有前途的方法,可以有效地评估和响应人群层面的医疗需求,但目前尚不清楚现有的细分方案在非医疗专业人员管理的社区调查背景下的表现如何。本前瞻性队列、社区设置研究旨在评估 4 种细分方案在预测未来健康结果和服务利用方面的实用性和预测有效性。
从新加坡公共出租住房居民的横断面健康和社会特征调查中确定了一个队列,年龄在 60 岁及以上。使用基线调查数据将个体分配到根据新加坡、特拉华州、伦巴第和伦敦西北部开发的 4 个预定义人群细分方案定义的细分中。从电子数据记录中,评估了基线细分分配后 180 天内的死亡率、住院、急诊就诊和专科门诊就诊情况,并将其与每种细分方案的细分成员资格进行比较。
在联系的 1324 名居民中,有 928 人同意参与调查(70%的应答率)。所有受试者都可以为每个细分方案分配一个专属的细分。根据健康效用的 EQ-5D 指数评估,处于更严重细分的个体往往生活质量较低。所有人群细分方案都显示出区分不同死亡率和医疗保健利用水平的能力。
通过非医疗专业人员进行的社区调查,可以将个体分配到基于医疗需求的人群细分中。通过这种方式评估的 4 种方案的细分都有能力预测 180 天内的健康结果和利用情况,其中一些细分有显著的重叠。旨在指导行动的基于医疗需求的细分方案对于促进服务的有效分配以满足重要人群的需求具有特别的意义。需要进一步评估这些方案是否也能预测对满足细分成员资格所隐含需求的干预措施的反应。