Matchar David, Vashishtha Rakhi, Jing Xu, Sivapragasam Nirmali, Sim Rita, Chong Jia Loon
Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
General Internal Medicine and Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12364-x.
Population segmentation provides a promising solution to address patients' complex needs to provide "whole person" care. The primary objective of this study is to create an expert-based algorithm based on combinations of medical and social characteristics derived from the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST), that are indicative of high value health and health-related social service (HASS) needs for an elderly population. The secondary objective was to examine the association between failing to meet the HASS needs 3-months post hospital discharge suggested by the algorithm and adverse outcomes over the ensuing year.
DESIGN & SETTING: Based on a parsimonious set of 10 patient characteristics identified in the SST, a representative expert panel was engaged using the Modified Appropriateness Methodology (MAM). A prospective study was then performed on patients admitted to the Singapore General Hospital, using HASS needs identified at discharge and met needs at 3 months post-discharge follow-up of services received, to assess whether unmet needs were associated with higher adverse outcomes in the year following discharge. The primary outcome of interest was time to all-cause mortality over 12-months post-discharge and was assessed with Cox regression analysis.
The MAM exercise resulted in 12 normatively defined high value services, using a combination of patients' medical and social characteristics based on the SST, as well as a list of means of providing those service needs. The all-cause mortality hazard ratio of having at least one unmet need versus having all needs met for individuals deemed to be chronically symptomatic at discharge was 1.949, (95% CI: 0.99 - 3.84, and p = 0.05), while for those who were either healthy or only had asymptomatic chronic conditions the all-cause mortality ratio of having at least one unmet need versus having all needs met was 0.28 (95% CI = 0.06-1.27 and p-value = 0.10). The hazard ratio for ED visits and hospital readmission were above one but did not reach level of 95% confidence level.
The SST methodology provides a practical way to assess HASS needs that are predictive of mortality when needs are not met. It could serve as a screening tool to identify individuals who are likely to benefit from detailed care planning and follow-up.
人群细分提供了一个有前景的解决方案,以满足患者对提供“全人”护理的复杂需求。本研究的主要目标是基于从简单细分工具(SST)得出的医学和社会特征组合创建一种基于专家的算法,这些特征表明老年人群对高价值健康和与健康相关的社会服务(HASS)的需求。次要目标是检查算法所提示的出院后3个月未满足HASS需求与随后一年不良结局之间的关联。
基于SST中确定的一组简洁的10个患者特征,使用改良适宜性方法(MAM)组建了一个具有代表性的专家小组。然后对入住新加坡总医院的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,利用出院时确定的HASS需求以及出院后3个月随访所接受服务时满足的需求,来评估未满足的需求是否与出院后一年中更高的不良结局相关。感兴趣的主要结局是出院后12个月内全因死亡时间,并通过Cox回归分析进行评估。
MAM流程使用基于SST的患者医学和社会特征组合,得出了12项规范定义的高价值服务,以及提供这些服务需求的方式列表。对于出院时被认为有慢性症状的个体,至少有一项需求未满足与所有需求都得到满足相比,全因死亡风险比为1.949(95%CI:0.99 - 3.84,p = 0.05),而对于那些健康或仅有无症状慢性病的个体,至少有一项需求未满足与所有需求都得到满足相比,全因死亡风险比为0.28(95%CI = 0.06 - 1.27,p值 = 0.10)。急诊就诊和再次入院的风险比高于1,但未达到95%置信水平。
SST方法提供了一种实用的方式来评估未满足需求时可预测死亡率的HASS需求。它可以作为一种筛查工具,用于识别可能从详细护理计划和随访中受益的个体。