• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较腹腔镜手术和机器人手术中人体工程学的初步研究:超越轶事和主观说法。

A pilot study comparing ergonomics in laparoscopy and robotics: beyond anecdotes, and subjective claims.

作者信息

Kuo Li-Jen, Ngu James Chi-Yong, Lin Yen-Kuang, Chen Chia-Che, Tang Yue-Her

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwa.

出版信息

J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Feb 21;2020(2):rjaa005. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa005. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/jscr/rjaa005
PMID:32104561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7033486/
Abstract

We aimed to use hand dexterity and grip strength test as objective measures to compare the difference in surgeon fatigue associated with robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We used the Purdue Pegboard Test to assess hand dexterity and the Camry Electronic Handgrip Dynamometer to assess hand grip strength. Eighteen patients were operated on, including 10 robotic and 8 laparoscopic cases. Statistical analysis revealed no difference in dexterity or muscle fatigue after operating with the robot. In contrast, there was a significant difference in the hand grip strength of both hands after laparoscopic surgery. Our results show that the resultant fatigue after laparoscopy affects both hands of the surgeon. In contrast, there was no difference in dexterity or muscle fatigue after operating with the robot. Given the demands of complex colorectal surgeries, robotics may be a means of optimizing surgeon performance by reducing fatigue.

摘要

我们旨在通过手部灵巧度和握力测试作为客观指标,比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠手术相关的外科医生疲劳差异。我们使用普渡钉板测试评估手部灵巧度,使用凯美瑞电子握力计评估握力。对18例患者进行了手术,其中包括10例机器人辅助手术和8例腹腔镜手术。统计分析显示,使用机器人手术后,灵巧度或肌肉疲劳没有差异。相比之下,腹腔镜手术后双手握力存在显著差异。我们的结果表明,腹腔镜手术后产生的疲劳会影响外科医生的双手。相比之下,使用机器人手术后灵巧度或肌肉疲劳没有差异。考虑到复杂结直肠手术的要求,机器人技术可能是通过减少疲劳来优化外科医生表现的一种手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f24/7033486/118281a252e5/rjaa005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f24/7033486/118281a252e5/rjaa005f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f24/7033486/118281a252e5/rjaa005f1.jpg

相似文献

1
A pilot study comparing ergonomics in laparoscopy and robotics: beyond anecdotes, and subjective claims.一项比较腹腔镜手术和机器人手术中人体工程学的初步研究:超越轶事和主观说法。
J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Feb 21;2020(2):rjaa005. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjaa005. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.机器人辅助赋予腹腔镜医师双手操作能力。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.微创外科的工效学:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术之间手术室肌肉用力与疲劳的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2323-2331. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6515-3. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Surgeon fatigue and postural stability: is robotic better than laparoscopic surgery?外科医生疲劳与姿势稳定性:机器人手术比腹腔镜手术更好吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Apr;23(4):343-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0531. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
5
Solving the surgeon ergonomic crisis with surgical exosuit.用手术外骨骼解决外科医生的人体工程学危机。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):236-244. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5667-x. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
6
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.妇科手术中的机器人辅助腹腔镜检查
JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):317-20.
7
Should All Minimal Access Surgery Be Robot-Assisted? A Systematic Review into the Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Demands of Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery.所有微创手术都应采用机器人辅助吗?对腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的肌肉骨骼及认知需求的系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jul;26(7):1520-1530. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05319-8. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
8
The effect of ergonomic laparoscopic tool handle design on performance and efficiency.符合人体工程学的腹腔镜手术器械手柄设计对操作性能和效率的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2500-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4005-9. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?机器人手术技能与腹腔镜手术技能的比较:学习曲线是否存在差异?
Urology. 2002 Jul;60(1):39-45; discussion 45. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01717-x.
10
The da Vinci(®) Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance.达芬奇(®)手术系统克服了天生的手优势。
J Endourol. 2011 Aug;25(8):1385-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0093. Epub 2011 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of ergonomic and muscular strain in surgeons comparing robotic to laparoscopic approaches.一项关于外科医生中人体工程学和肌肉劳损的系统评价,比较机器人手术与腹腔镜手术方法。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 31;19(1):252. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02401-6.
2
Effect of forearm compression sleeve on muscle fatigue during robotic surgery: a randomized controlled study.前臂加压袖套对机器人手术中肌肉疲劳的影响:一项随机对照研究。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Mar 15;28(1):11-18. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.1.11.
3
Ergonomic interventions to reduce upper limb musculoskeletal pain during robotic surgery: a narrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.系统评价评估外科医生术中认知工作量的测量工具。
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):491-501. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10795. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances.外科手术中立体成像的发展及近期进展
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):368-377. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.368.
3
Robotic vs. Standard Laparoscopic Technique - What is Better?机器人手术与标准腹腔镜技术——哪种更好?
机器人手术中减少上肢肌肉骨骼疼痛的工效学干预措施:叙事性综述。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 27;18(1):224. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01992-w.
4
Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system.使用达芬奇单孔系统进行直肠癌腹会阴联合全直肠系膜切除术的初步经验。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Dec 15;26(4):208-214. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.4.208.
5
Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.腹腔镜与机器人腹部和盆腔手术:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6672-6681. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10275-8. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
6
What Is the Current Role and What Are the Prospects of the Robotic Approach in Liver Surgery?机器人手术在肝脏外科中的当前作用及前景如何?
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 31;14(17):4268. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174268.
Front Surg. 2014 May 15;1:15. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00015. eCollection 2014.
4
Surgeons' display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy.与传统腹腔镜手术相比,外科医生在进行机器人辅助手术任务时,表现出较低的心理努力和工作量。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2553-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3967-y. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Surgeon fatigue: a prospective analysis of the incidence, risk, and intervals of predicted fatigue-related impairment in residents.外科医生疲劳:对住院医师中预测的与疲劳相关损伤的发生率、风险和间隔的前瞻性分析。
Arch Surg. 2012 May;147(5):430-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.84.
6
An exhausted workforce increases the risk of errors.疲惫的员工队伍会增加出错的风险。
P T. 2009 Mar;34(3):120-3.
7
Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.对外科医生来说,进行腹腔镜手术比开腹手术压力要大得多。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1204-7. doi: 10.1007/s004640080030.
8
Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.与腹腔镜手术相关的人体工程学问题。
Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):466-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00009635.
9
Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations.微创外科何去何从:困境与期望
Am J Surg. 1995 Jan;169(1):9-19. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)80104-4.