Schwab Katie, Smith Ralph, Brown Vanessa, Whyte Martin, Jourdan Iain
Katie Schwab, Ralph Smith, Vanessa Brown, Iain Jourdan, Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit, Post Graduate Medical School, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7WG, United Kingdom.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):368-377. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.368.
In the late 1980s the first laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed prompting a sudden rise in technological innovations as the benefits and feasibility of minimal access surgery became recognised. Monocular laparoscopes provided only two-dimensional (2D) viewing with reduced depth perception and contributed to an extended learning curve. Attention turned to producing a usable three-dimensional (3D) endoscopic view for surgeons; utilising different technologies for image capture and image projection. These evolving visual systems have been assessed in various research environments with conflicting outcomes of success and usability, and no overall consensus to their benefit. This review article aims to provide an explanation of the different types of technologies, summarise the published literature evaluating 3D 2D laparoscopy, to explain the conflicting outcomes, and discuss the current consensus view.
20世纪80年代末,首例腹腔镜胆囊切除术得以实施,随着微创外科手术的益处和可行性得到认可,技术创新突然兴起。单目腹腔镜仅提供二维(2D)视野,深度感知能力降低,这导致学习曲线延长。人们开始关注为外科医生提供可用的三维(3D)内镜视野;利用不同技术进行图像采集和图像投影。这些不断发展的视觉系统已在各种研究环境中进行了评估,结果在成功性和可用性方面存在冲突,对于其益处也没有达成总体共识。这篇综述文章旨在解释不同类型的技术,总结评估3D和2D腹腔镜检查的已发表文献,解释相互矛盾的结果,并讨论当前的共识观点。