Krishnamoorthy Yuvaraj, Ganesh Karthika, Sakthivel Manikandanesan
Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry - 605008, India.
National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Jan 28;10(1):8-12. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2020.04. eCollection 2020.
National Nutritional Monitoring Bureau survey (2017) has found that more than half of the adults in India were overweight and obese. To halt this rising epidemic, development of various policy measures has been suggested in National action plan for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. One such measure is the introduction of fat tax which is a surcharge or tax placed on food and beverages containing high amounts of fat. Government of India has made various direct budgetary initiatives for boosting the sectors related to the production of items rich in fat, sugars and salt without realizing the potential public health consequences. Hence, increasing the taxes for unhealthy junk foods should encourage the people to take healthier food options which in turn lead to positive impact on health. However, fat taxationfaced several challenges during implementation in countries like Denmark, Hungary, France and United States. Major challenges were the taxation debate, setting tax limit and encroaching into the autonomy rights of people. Evidences have shown that taxation alone cannot bring down the burden of non-communicable diseases but should be combined with measures like subsidies and access to healthy food items, public health education campaigns and programmes.
国家营养监测局2017年的调查发现,印度超过一半的成年人超重和肥胖。为阻止这一日益严重的流行病,《国家非传染性疾病预防和控制行动计划》提出了各种政策措施。其中一项措施是征收脂肪税,这是对含有大量脂肪的食品和饮料征收的附加费或税款。印度政府已采取各种直接预算举措,以促进与富含脂肪、糖和盐的产品生产相关的行业发展,却未意识到潜在的公共卫生后果。因此,提高不健康垃圾食品的税收应能鼓励人们选择更健康的食品,进而对健康产生积极影响。然而,在丹麦、匈牙利、法国和美国等国家实施脂肪税时面临了若干挑战。主要挑战包括税收辩论、设定税收限额以及侵犯人们的自主权。有证据表明,仅靠征税无法减轻非传染性疾病的负担,而应与补贴、获取健康食品、公共健康教育运动和项目等措施相结合。