• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数/肥胖与消费者价格敏感度:对食品税收政策的影响。

BMI/Obesity and consumers' price sensitivity: Implications for food tax policies.

作者信息

Bao Ying, Osborne Matthew, Wang Emily, Jaenicke Edward C

机构信息

Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana and Champaign, 1206 S 6th Street, Champaign, IL 61822, USA.

Department of Management, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 11;3(6):pgae190. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae190. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae190
PMID:38864007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11165645/
Abstract

We examine the relationship between BMI and food purchase behavior using a unique dataset that links individual-level food purchases to health data. We find that individuals with higher BMI are significantly more sensitive to price changes in vice categories but do not show similar sensitivity in comparable nonvice categories. We rely on past literature that defines and identifies vice categories as those that are tempting and purchased impulsively. We explore the effectiveness of a 10% price increase on vice food categories, a hypothetical policy similar in spirit to a fat tax or sugar tax. We predict that such a tax would substantially reduce consumption of these foods, and would be particularly effective in reducing consumption by individuals with higher BMI.

摘要

我们使用一个独特的数据集来研究体重指数(BMI)与食品购买行为之间的关系,该数据集将个人层面的食品购买与健康数据联系起来。我们发现,BMI较高的个体对不良品类的价格变化更为敏感,但在可比的非不良品类中却没有表现出类似的敏感性。我们依据以往的文献,将不良品类定义并识别为那些具有诱惑性且冲动购买的品类。我们探讨了对不良食品品类提价10%的有效性,这一假设政策在本质上类似于脂肪税或糖税。我们预测,这样的税收将大幅减少这些食品的消费,并且对减少BMI较高个体的消费尤为有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe1/11165645/def634dc8714/pgae190f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe1/11165645/5ba48d5b886f/pgae190f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe1/11165645/def634dc8714/pgae190f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe1/11165645/5ba48d5b886f/pgae190f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dfe1/11165645/def634dc8714/pgae190f2.jpg

相似文献

1
BMI/Obesity and consumers' price sensitivity: Implications for food tax policies.体重指数/肥胖与消费者价格敏感度:对食品税收政策的影响。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 11;3(6):pgae190. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae190. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The effect of food price changes on consumer purchases: a randomised experiment.食品价格变化对消费者购买行为的影响:一项随机实验。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Aug;4(8):e394-e405. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30105-7.
3
Changes in sugar-sweetened beverage purchases across the price distribution after the implementation of a tax in Mexico: a before-and-after analysis.墨西哥开征含糖饮料税后价格分布变化与购买量变化的前后对比分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15041-y.
4
Effects of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax on prices and affordability of soft drinks in Chile: A time series analysis.含糖饮料税对智利软饮料价格和可负担性的影响:一项时间序列分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112708. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
Sugar-sweetened beverage purchases in urban Peru before the implementation of taxation and warning label policies: a baseline study.城市秘鲁在实施税收和警示标签政策之前的含糖饮料购买情况:基线研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):2389. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14762-w.
6
Taxation of unprocessed sugar or sugar-added foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes.对未加工糖或添加糖食品征税以减少其消费并预防肥胖或其他不良健康后果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012333.pub2.
7
Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children.定向饮料税影响有学龄前儿童家庭的食品和饮料购买行为。
J Nutr. 2015 Aug;145(8):1835-43. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.210765. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
8
Price, Income, and Affordability as the Determinants of Tobacco Consumption: A Practitioner's Guide to Tobacco Taxation.价格、收入和可负担性对烟草消费的影响:烟草税的实用指南。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):40-47. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa134.
9
Impact of soda tax on beverage price, sale, purchase, and consumption in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments.美国苏打税对饮料价格、销售、购买和消费的影响:基于自然实验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 22;11:1126569. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1126569. eCollection 2023.
10
Do purchases of price promoted and generic branded foods and beverages vary according to food category and income level? Evidence from a consumer research panel.促销价格的购买和通用品牌的食品和饮料是否因食品类别和收入水平而异?来自消费者研究小组的证据。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104481. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Sixteen-year trends in adolescent consumption of sugar-sweetened soda in six European countries with a soda tax and comparison countries: a repeated cross-sectional survey analysis.对六个设有汽水税的欧洲国家及对照国家青少年含糖汽水消费情况的十六年趋势:一项重复横断面调查分析
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Mar;26(3):519-530. doi: 10.1017/S1368980022002361. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
2
Public health lessons from the French 2012 soda tax and insights on the modifications enacted in 2018.从法国 2012 年苏打税中吸取的公共卫生教训以及 2018 年颁布的修正案的见解。
Health Policy. 2022 Jul;126(7):585-591. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Bittersweet: How prices of sugar-rich foods contribute to the diet-related disease epidemic in Mexico.
苦乐参半:含糖量高的食物价格如何助推墨西哥饮食相关疾病流行。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102506. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Viewpoint: Can U.S. local soda taxes continue to spread?观点:美国地方汽水税会持续推广吗?
Food Policy. 2017 Aug;71:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
5
Impacts of a sugar sweetened beverage tax on body mass index and obesity in Thailand: A modelling study.糖税对泰国体重指数和肥胖的影响:建模研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0250841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250841. eCollection 2021.
6
The effectiveness of sin food taxes: Evidence from Mexico.征收“罪恶食品”税的效果:来自墨西哥的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 May;77:102455. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102455. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
7
Grocery food taxes and U.S. county obesity and diabetes rates.食品杂货税与美国各县的肥胖率和糖尿病发病率
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Feb 13;11(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00306-2.
8
Fat taxation in India: A critical appraisal of need, public health impact, and challenges in nationwide implementation.印度的脂肪税:对必要性、公共卫生影响及全国实施中的挑战的批判性评估。
Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Jan 28;10(1):8-12. doi: 10.15171/hpp.2020.04. eCollection 2020.
9
A sales tax is better at promoting healthy diets than the fat tax and the thin subsidy.销售税比脂肪税和补贴更能促进健康饮食。
Health Econ. 2020 Mar;29(3):353-366. doi: 10.1002/hec.3987. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children.费城饮料税对成年人和儿童购买和消费的影响。
J Health Econ. 2019 Sep;67:102225. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102225. Epub 2019 Aug 13.