Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, The Woodlands, Texas.
Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Mar;26(3):311-318. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.3.311.
Diabetes health care resource utilization (HCRU) studies tend to focus on patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or pool patients with T2D and type 1 diabetes (T1D). There is a paucity of recent data on the cost of treating patients with T1D in the United States.
To (a) estimate the per-patient per-year (PPPY) HCRU and costs, from a payer perspective, associated with treating U.S. adults with T1D and (b) compare these with the HCRU and costs for patients with T2D.
This retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Optum Clinformatics database between January 2015 and December 2017. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of T1D were propensity score-matched to adults with T2D. Overall and nondiabetes-related HCRU and costs were assessed for T1D and T2D and compared between the 2 groups.
Propensity scores were used to match 10,103 patient pairs from T1D and T2D cohorts (mean ages 54.4 and 56.9 years, respectively). In the T1D cohort, inpatient, emergency department (ED), outpatient, and prescription claims occurred in 14.0%, 17.3%, 85.5%, and 100% of patients, respectively, resulting in a mean total cost of U.S. $18,817 PPPY (diabetes-related = $11,002; nondiabetes-related = $7,816). The T1D cohort had significantly higher mean total costs than the T2D cohort ($18,817 vs. $14,148 PPPY; < 0.001). When extrapolating these findings to a commercial health plan with 1 million covered lives, the estimated total direct medical costs of T1D would be $103.4 million.
This study showed that the total annual cost of managing an adult with T1D is significantly higher than that of an adult with T2D. Nondiabetes costs accounted for 40% of the total per-patient cost, similar to patients with T2D, confirming that as patients with T1D live longer lives, they may also be at greater risk for cardiometabolic complications.
This study was funded by Sanofi U.S. and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals as part of a business partnership in a diabetes program at the time this study was conducted. Joish and Davies are employees and stockholders of Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Zhou, Preblick, and Paranjape are employees and stockholders of Sanofi. Lin was a postdoctoral fellow at Sanofi through Rutgers University during this project. Deshpande provided consulting services through Communication Symmetry. Verma is an employee of Evidera, which was contracted by Sanofi for work on this study. Pettus is a consultant for Diasome, Insulet, Lexicon, Lilly, Mannkind, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Senseonics.
糖尿病医疗资源利用(HCRU)研究往往侧重于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者,或者将 T2D 患者和 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者合并在一起。目前,关于美国 T1D 患者治疗成本的最新数据很少。
(a)从支付者的角度估算治疗美国 T1D 成年患者的每位患者每年(PPPY)HCRU 和成本,以及(b)与 T2D 患者的 HCRU 和成本进行比较。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了 Optum Clinformatics 数据库在 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间的数据。年龄≥18 岁、患有 T1D 的成年人与 T2D 患者进行倾向评分匹配。评估了 T1D 和 T2D 患者的总体和非糖尿病相关 HCRU 和成本,并对两组患者进行了比较。
使用倾向评分匹配了 T1D 和 T2D 队列中的 10103 对患者(平均年龄分别为 54.4 岁和 56.9 岁)。在 T1D 队列中,住院、急诊(ED)、门诊和处方分别有 14.0%、17.3%、85.5%和 100%的患者发生,导致每位患者的平均总费用为 18817 美元 PPPY(糖尿病相关费用为 11002 美元,非糖尿病相关费用为 7816 美元)。T1D 队列的总费用显著高于 T2D 队列(18817 美元 vs. 14148 美元 PPPY;<0.001)。将这些发现外推到一个拥有 100 万被保险人的商业健康计划中,T1D 的估计总直接医疗费用将为 1.034 亿美元。
这项研究表明,管理 T1D 成年患者的年总成本明显高于 T2D 成年患者。非糖尿病相关费用占每位患者总费用的 40%,与 T2D 患者相似,这证实了随着 T1D 患者寿命延长,他们可能面临更大的心血管代谢并发症风险。
这项研究由赛诺菲美国公司和 Lexicon 制药公司资助,作为当时进行的糖尿病项目业务合作的一部分。Joish 和 Davies 是 Lexicon 制药公司的员工和股东。Zhou、Preblick 和 Paranjape 是赛诺菲美国公司的员工和股东。Lin 在该项目期间是 Rutgers 大学赛诺菲美国公司的博士后研究员。Deshpande 通过 Communication Symmetry 提供咨询服务。Verma 是 Evidera 的员工,赛诺菲美国公司聘请了该公司从事该研究。Pettus 是 Diasome、Insulet、Lexicon、Lilly、Mannkind、Novo Nordisk、Sanofi 和 Senseonics 的顾问。