Ianno Damian James, Mirowska-Allen Kelly, Kunz Stephen Anthony, O'Brien Richard
Department of Emergency Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020 Jan;17:9. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.9. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
Medically-focused journal clubs have been used as an educational tool for over 100 years with research indicating that they improve knowledge, reading behaviour, and critical appraisal skills. However, it is not known how widespread their use is among Australian medical schools, nor the opinions of medical education leaders as to their value.
A nationwide cross-sectional study was performed on academic leaders from every Australian medical school. Individuals were asked to complete a survey detailing their attitudes towards journal clubs using single or multiple answer questions, Likert scales, and ranked data. They were asked whether students at their institutions were able to partake in journal clubs, and if so, details of their implementation.
At least one response was collected from 18 of 19 Australian medical schools. This represented 60 responses of a possible 147 (40.8%), the vast majority of whom were heads of clinical schools, 36 (60.0%). The prevalence of journal clubs among medical institutions was high, with 15 of 18 (83.3%) stating that they had a journal club. Of these 23 (65.7%) were metropolitan and 12 (34.3%) were rural institutions. Most were clinician-led, 18 (51.4%), run through specific hospital departments, 13 (37.1%), and most frequently occurred during clinical years, 23 (65.7%). The vast majority stated that the primary aim of the journal club was to develop critical appraisal skills, 20 (57.1%).
Journal clubs are a highly regarded educational tool in the armoury of medical school educators, with significant heterogeneity in their structure, geographic prevalence and intended purpose. Further studies into their efficacy in teaching evidence-based medicine is warranted in the medical student cohort.
以医学为重点的期刊俱乐部作为一种教育工具已使用了100多年,研究表明它们能提高知识水平、阅读行为和批判性评价技能。然而,尚不清楚它们在澳大利亚医学院校中的使用有多广泛,也不清楚医学教育领导者对其价值的看法。
对澳大利亚每所医学院校的学术带头人进行了一项全国性横断面研究。要求参与者通过单项或多项选择题、李克特量表和排序数据完成一项调查,详细说明他们对期刊俱乐部的态度。询问他们所在院校的学生是否能够参加期刊俱乐部,如果可以,还要提供其实施细节。
从19所澳大利亚医学院校中的18所至少收集到了一份回复。这代表了可能的147份回复中的60份(40.8%),其中绝大多数是临床医学院的院长,有36人(60.0%)。医疗机构中期刊俱乐部的普及率很高,1�所中的15所(83.3%)表示他们有一个期刊俱乐部。在这些俱乐部中,23所(65.7%)位于大都市,12所(34.3%)位于农村地区。大多数由临床医生主导,有18所(51.4%),通过特定医院科室开展,有13所(37.1%),且最常在临床学年期间进行,有23所(65.7%)。绝大多数表示期刊俱乐部的主要目的是培养批判性评价技能,有20所(57.1%)。
期刊俱乐部是医学院校教育工作者武器库中备受重视的教育工具,其结构、地域普及率和预期目的存在显著异质性。有必要对其在医学生群体中教授循证医学的效果进行进一步研究。