• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中期胸腺和激活调节趋化因子与氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描在经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤反应评估中的比较。

Interim thymus and activation regulated chemokine versus interim F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in classical Hodgkin lymphoma response evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2020 Jul;190(1):40-44. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16514. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1111/bjh.16514
PMID:32106342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7383815/
Abstract

Serum thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC) levels reflect classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) disease activity and correspond with treatment response. We compared mid-treatment interim TARC (iTARC) with interim F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (iPET) imaging to predict modified progression-free survival (mPFS) in a group of 95 patients with cHL. High iTARC levels were found in nine and positive iPET in 17 patients. The positive predictive value (PPV) of iTARC for a 5-year mPFS event was 88% compared to 47% for iPET. The negative predictive value was comparable at 86% for iTARC and 85% for iPET. Serum iTARC levels more accurately reflect treatment response with a higher PPV compared to iPET.

摘要

血清胸腺和激活调节趋化因子(TARC)水平反映经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)的疾病活动情况,并与治疗反应相对应。我们比较了 95 例 cHL 患者治疗中期的 TARC(iTARC)与中期 F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(iPET)成像,以预测改良无进展生存期(mPFS)。9 例患者 iTARC 水平较高,17 例患者 iPET 阳性。与 iPET 相比,iTARC 对 5 年 mPFS 事件的阳性预测值(PPV)为 88%,而 iPET 为 47%。阴性预测值方面,iTARC 和 iPET 分别为 86%和 85%,两者相当。与 iPET 相比,血清 iTARC 水平更能准确反映治疗反应,其阳性预测值更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f820/7383815/4006aa6e3b46/BJH-190-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f820/7383815/4006aa6e3b46/BJH-190-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f820/7383815/4006aa6e3b46/BJH-190-40-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Interim thymus and activation regulated chemokine versus interim F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in classical Hodgkin lymphoma response evaluation.中期胸腺和激活调节趋化因子与氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描在经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤反应评估中的比较。
Br J Haematol. 2020 Jul;190(1):40-44. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16514. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
CD68+ cell count, early evaluation with PET and plasma TARC levels predict response in Hodgkin lymphoma.CD68+细胞计数、PET早期评估及血浆TARC水平可预测霍奇金淋巴瘤的反应。
Cancer Med. 2016 Mar;5(3):398-406. doi: 10.1002/cam4.585. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
3
Interim FDG-PET/CT for Response Assessment of Lymphoma.淋巴瘤疗效评估的 FDG-PET/CT 影像学表现
Semin Nucl Med. 2023 May;53(3):371-388. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
4
CD68-positive tumor-associated macrophages predict unfavorable treatment outcomes in classical Hodgkin lymphoma in correlation with interim fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography assessment.CD68阳性肿瘤相关巨噬细胞与中期氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描评估相关,提示经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗结果不佳。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2015 Feb;56(2):332-41. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2014.917636. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
5
Baseline and interim PET-based outcome prediction in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A subgroup analysis of the PETAL trial.基于基线和中期 PET 的外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤预后预测:PETAL 试验的亚组分析。
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(3):244-256. doi: 10.1002/hon.2697. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
A Gene Expression-based Model to Predict Metabolic Response After Two Courses of ABVD in Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients.基于基因表达的模型预测霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受两疗程 ABVD 后的代谢反应。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 15;26(2):373-383. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2356. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
Serum levels of TARC, MDC, IL-10, and soluble CD163 in Hodgkin lymphoma: a SWOG S0816 correlative study.霍奇金淋巴瘤患者血清 TARC、MDC、IL-10 和可溶性 CD163 水平:SWOG S0816 相关性研究。
Blood. 2019 Apr 18;133(16):1762-1765. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-870915. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
8
Importance of Central Imaging Review in a Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Trial Using Positron Emission Tomography Response Adapted Radiation Therapy.正电子发射断层扫描反应适应放疗在儿科霍奇金淋巴瘤试验中进行中心影像学评估的重要性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Aug 1;116(5):1025-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
Clinical and prognostic role of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in elderly Hodgkin lymphoma: a dual-center experience.老年霍奇金淋巴瘤中 18F-FDG PET/CT 中期结果的临床和预后作用:一项双中心经验。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Dec;61(13):3209-3216. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1797012. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
10
Paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma: information derived from diffuse organ uptake of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose on pre-treatment and on interim PET/CT.儿童及青少年霍奇金淋巴瘤:来自治疗前及中期PET/CT上18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖弥漫性器官摄取的信息
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(7):1220-30. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3280-6. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum TARC dynamics during anti-PD1-based first-line Hodgkin lymphoma treatment: An analysis from the GHSG NIVAHL trial.基于抗PD1的一线霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗期间血清TARC的动态变化:来自德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组NIVAHL试验的分析
Hemasphere. 2025 Aug 22;9(8):e70205. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70205. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Working towards harmonization of clinical trial reporting in Hodgkin lymphoma.致力于霍奇金淋巴瘤临床试验报告的统一。
Hemasphere. 2025 Aug 7;9(8):e70196. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70196. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Molecular profiling of cell-free DNA from classic Hodgkin lymphoma patients identifies potential prognostic clusters and corresponds with disease dynamics.

本文引用的文献

1
Serum levels of TARC, MDC, IL-10, and soluble CD163 in Hodgkin lymphoma: a SWOG S0816 correlative study.霍奇金淋巴瘤患者血清 TARC、MDC、IL-10 和可溶性 CD163 水平:SWOG S0816 相关性研究。
Blood. 2019 Apr 18;133(16):1762-1765. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-870915. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
PET-guided treatment in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD18): final results of an open-label, international, randomised phase 3 trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group.PET 引导治疗晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤(HD18):德国霍奇金研究组开展的一项开放标签、国际、随机 3 期临床试验的最终结果。
Lancet. 2017 Dec 23;390(10114):2790-2802. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32134-7. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
3
经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤患者游离DNA的分子谱分析确定了潜在的预后聚类,并与疾病动态变化相关。
Ann Hematol. 2025 Mar;104(3):1789-1800. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06328-8. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
4
CCL17, CCL22 and their receptor CCR4 in hematologic malignancies.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的CCL17、CCL22及其受体CCR4
Discov Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;15(1):412. doi: 10.1007/s12672-024-01210-x.
5
Elevated serum TARC levels precede classic Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis by several years.血清 TARC 水平升高可在经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤诊断前数年出现。
Blood. 2023 Nov 30;142(22):1928-1931. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023020959.
6
The value of thymus and activation related chemokine immunohistochemistry in classic Hodgkin lymphoma diagnostics.胸腺癌和激活相关趋化因子免疫组化在经典霍奇金淋巴瘤诊断中的价值。
Histopathology. 2023 Feb;82(3):495-503. doi: 10.1111/his.14836. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
7
Prognostic value of TARC and quantitative PET parameters in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with brentuximab vedotin and DHAP.TARC和PET定量参数在接受本妥昔单抗和DHAP治疗的复发或难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中的预后价值
Leukemia. 2022 Dec;36(12):2853-2862. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01717-8. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
8
Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) as treatment response marker for paediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: A pilot study.胸腺和激活调节趋化因子(TARC)作为儿科霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗反应标志物的初步研究。
Br J Haematol. 2023 Jan;200(1):70-78. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18473. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
9
Blood-circulating EV-miRNAs, serum TARC, and quantitative FDG-PET features in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤中的循环血液外泌体微小RNA、血清胸腺和活化调节趋化因子以及定量氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像特征
EJHaem. 2022 Apr 28;3(3):908-912. doi: 10.1002/jha2.432. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
The Prognostic Value of Eight Immunohistochemical Markers Expressed in the Tumor Microenvironment and on Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg Cells in Pediatric Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.肿瘤微环境中表达的 8 种免疫组化标志物及霍奇金 Reed-Sternberg 细胞对儿童经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤的预后价值。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2022 Aug 11;28:1610482. doi: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610482. eCollection 2022.
Early reduction of serum TARC levels may predict for success of ABVD as frontline treatment in patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.
血清TARC水平的早期降低可能预示着ABVD作为霍奇金淋巴瘤患者一线治疗的成功。
Leuk Res. 2017 Nov;62:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
4
Early Positron Emission Tomography Response-Adapted Treatment in Stage I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Final Results of the Randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial.早期正电子发射断层扫描反应适应性治疗 I 期和 II 期霍奇金淋巴瘤:随机 EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 试验的最终结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1786-1794. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.6394. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
5
Biomarkers for evaluation of treatment response in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: comparison of sGalectin-1, sCD163 and sCD30 with TARC.用于评估经典型霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗反应的生物标志物:可溶性半乳糖凝集素-1、可溶性CD163和可溶性CD30与胸腺和活化调节趋化因子的比较
Br J Haematol. 2016 Dec;175(5):868-875. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14317. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Adapted Treatment Guided by Interim PET-CT Scan in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma.基于中期PET-CT扫描指导的晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤适应性治疗
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 23;374(25):2419-29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510093.
7
Eight Cycles of ABVD Versus Four Cycles of BEACOPPescalated Plus Four Cycles of BEACOPPbaseline in Stage III to IV, International Prognostic Score ≥ 3, High-Risk Hodgkin Lymphoma: First Results of the Phase III EORTC 20012 Intergroup Trial.III 期至 IV 期国际预后评分≥3、高危霍奇金淋巴瘤:ABVD 方案 8 个周期与 BEACOPPescalated 方案加 BEACOPPbaseline 方案 4 个周期比较、EORTC 20012 组间试验的 III 期研究的初步结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;34(17):2028-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5648. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
8
Biomarkers for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.特应性皮炎的生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;15(5):453-60. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000198.
9
Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma.早期霍奇金淋巴瘤的 PET 导向治疗试验结果。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1598-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408648.
10
Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification.霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤初始评估、分期及反应评估的建议:卢加诺分类
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800.