Department of Orthopaedics, Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University.
Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics, Kungälv Hospital.
Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):306-312. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1733375. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Background and purpose - Fast-track care programs have been broadly introduced at Swedish hospitals in elective total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR). We studied the influence of fast-track programs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 1 year after surgery, by exploring outcome measures registered in the Swedish arthroplasty registers.Patients and methods - Data were obtained from the Swedish Knee and Hip Arthroplasty Registers and included TKR and THR operations 2011-2015 on patients with osteoarthritis. Based on questionnaires concerning the clinical pathway and care programs at Swedish hospitals, the patients were divided in 2 groups depending on whether they had been operated in a fast-track program or not. PROs of the fast-track group were compared with not fast-track using regression analysis. EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS were analyzed for both THR and TKR operations. The PROMs for TKR also included KOOS.Results - The differences of EQ-5D, EQ VAS, Pain VAS, and Satisfaction VAS 1 year after surgery were small but all in favor of fast-track for both THR and TKR, also in subscales of KOOS for TKR except KOOS QoL. However, the effect sizes as measured by Cohens' d formula were < 0.2 for all PROs, in both THR and TKR.Interpretation - Our results indicate that the fast-track programs may be at least as good as conventional care from the perspective of PROs 1-year postoperatively.
背景与目的-快速通道护理方案已在瑞典的多家医院广泛应用于择期全髋关节和全膝关节置换术(THR/TKR)。我们通过研究瑞典关节置换登记处中记录的评估指标,探讨了快速通道方案对术后 1 年患者报告结局(PROs)的影响。
患者与方法-本研究数据来源于瑞典膝关节和髋关节置换登记处,纳入了 2011 年至 2015 年间患有骨关节炎、接受 THR 和 TKR 手术的患者。根据患者在瑞典医院的临床路径和护理方案的问卷调查,我们将患者分为接受快速通道方案和未接受快速通道方案两组。采用回归分析比较了快速通道组和非快速通道组的 PROs。分析了 THR 和 TKR 手术的 EQ-5D、EQ VAS、疼痛 VAS 和满意度 VAS。TKR 的 PROMs 还包括 KOOS。
结果-术后 1 年,快速通道组在 EQ-5D、EQ VAS、疼痛 VAS 和满意度 VAS 方面的差异虽小,但均有利于快速通道,在 TKR 的 KOOS 亚量表中除了 KOOS QoL 外也如此。然而,所有 PROs 的 Cohens' d 公式测量的效应大小均<0.2。
结论-从术后 1 年的 PROs 角度来看,快速通道方案至少与常规护理一样好。