• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在双相情感障碍神经影像学中的应用能否帮助临床医生?批判性评价和方法学建议。

Will machine learning applied to neuroimaging in bipolar disorder help the clinician? A critical review and methodological suggestions.

机构信息

APHP, Mondor University Hospitals, DMU IMPACT Psychiatry and Addictology, UPEC, Créteil, France.

Neurospin, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jun;22(4):334-355. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12895. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/bdi.12895
PMID:32108409
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The existence of anatomofunctional brain abnormalities in bipolar disorder (BD) is now well established by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. To create diagnostic and prognostic tools, as well as identifying biologically valid subtypes of BD, research has recently turned towards the use of machine learning (ML) techniques. We assessed both supervised ML and unsupervised ML studies in BD to evaluate their robustness, reproducibility and the potential need for improvement.

METHOD

We systematically searched for studies using ML algorithms based on MRI data of patients with BD until February 2019.

RESULT

We identified 47 studies, 45 using supervised ML techniques and 2 including unsupervised ML analyses. Among supervised studies, 43 focused on diagnostic classification. The reported accuracies for classification of BD ranged between (a) 57% and 100%, for BD vs healthy controls; (b) 49.5% and 93.1% for BD vs patients with major depressive disorder; and (c) 50% and 96.2% for BD vs patients with schizophrenia. Reported accuracies for discriminating subjects genetically at risk for BD (either from control or from patients with BD) ranged between 64.3% and 88.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are strong methodological limitations in previous studies and an important need for replication in large multicentric samples, the conclusions of our review bring hope of future computer-aided diagnosis of BD and pave the way for other applications, such as treatment response prediction. To reinforce the reliability of future results we provide methodological suggestions for good practice in conducting and reporting MRI-based ML studies in BD.

摘要

目的

磁共振成像(MRI)研究现已证实双相情感障碍(BD)存在解剖功能脑异常。为了创建诊断和预后工具,并确定 BD 的生物学有效亚型,研究最近转向使用机器学习(ML)技术。我们评估了 BD 中的有监督 ML 和无监督 ML 研究,以评估它们的稳健性、可重复性和潜在的改进需求。

方法

我们系统地搜索了基于 MRI 数据的使用 ML 算法的研究,这些研究针对的是直到 2019 年 2 月的 BD 患者。

结果

我们确定了 47 项研究,其中 45 项使用了有监督的 ML 技术,2 项包括无监督的 ML 分析。在有监督的研究中,43 项专注于诊断分类。BD 与健康对照组之间的分类准确性报告范围为(a)57%至 100%;BD 与重性抑郁障碍患者之间的准确性报告范围为(b)49.5%至 93.1%;BD 与精神分裂症患者之间的准确性报告范围为(c)50%至 96.2%。用于区分具有 BD 遗传风险的受试者(来自对照组或来自 BD 患者)的报告准确性范围为 64.3%至 88.93%。

结论

尽管之前的研究存在很强的方法学限制,并且在大型多中心样本中需要进行复制,但我们的综述结论带来了未来 BD 计算机辅助诊断的希望,并为其他应用铺平了道路,例如治疗反应预测。为了增强未来结果的可靠性,我们提供了在 BD 中进行和报告基于 MRI 的 ML 研究的良好实践方法学建议。

相似文献

1
Will machine learning applied to neuroimaging in bipolar disorder help the clinician? A critical review and methodological suggestions.机器学习在双相情感障碍神经影像学中的应用能否帮助临床医生?批判性评价和方法学建议。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jun;22(4):334-355. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12895. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Towards person-centered neuroimaging markers for resilience and vulnerability in Bipolar Disorder.迈向以个体为中心的双相情感障碍恢复力和易损性神经影像学标志物
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan 15;145(Pt B):230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.066. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
3
Magnetoencephalography resting-state spectral fingerprints distinguish bipolar depression and unipolar depression.静息态磁共振光谱特征可区分双相抑郁和单相抑郁。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Sep;22(6):612-620. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12871. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
4
Automated cortical thickness and skewness feature selection in bipolar disorder using a semi-supervised learning method.使用半监督学习方法在双相障碍中自动进行皮质厚度和偏度特征选择。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Sep 1;256:416-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
5
Distinguishing medication-free subjects with unipolar disorder from subjects with bipolar disorder: state matters.区分无躁狂发作的单相情感障碍患者与双相情感障碍患者:状态很重要。
Bipolar Disord. 2016 Nov;18(7):612-623. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12446. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
6
A proof of concept machine learning analysis using multimodal neuroimaging and neurocognitive measures as predictive biomarker in bipolar disorder.使用多模态神经影像学和神经认知测量作为双相障碍预测生物标志物的概念验证机器学习分析。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Apr;50:101984. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101984. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
7
Differentiating between bipolar and unipolar depression in functional and structural MRI studies.在功能和结构磁共振成像研究中区分双相和单相抑郁症。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 20;91:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
The impact of machine learning techniques in the study of bipolar disorder: A systematic review.机器学习技术在双相情感障碍研究中的影响:系统评价。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:538-554. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Using structural MRI to identify individuals at genetic risk for bipolar disorders: a 2-cohort, machine learning study.使用结构磁共振成像识别双相情感障碍遗传风险个体:一项双队列机器学习研究。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2015 Sep;40(5):316-24. doi: 10.1503/jpn.140142.
10
Distinguishing between bipolar depression and unipolar depression based on the reward circuit activities and clinical characteristics: A machine learning analysis.基于奖赏回路活动和临床特征区分双相抑郁和单相抑郁:一项机器学习分析。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Apr 14;327:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.080. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍
Lancet. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01140-7.
2
Brain structural connectomic topology predicts medication response in youth with bipolar disorder: A randomized clinical trial.脑结构连接组拓扑结构预测双相情感障碍青少年的药物反应:一项随机临床试验。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Feb 15;371:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.061. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
Predicting maintenance lithium response for bipolar disorder from electronic health records-a retrospective study.从电子健康记录预测双相情感障碍的维持锂反应:一项回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 14;12:e17841. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17841. eCollection 2024.
4
Translational Connectomics: overview of machine learning in macroscale Connectomics for clinical insights.转化连接组学:机器学习在宏观连接组学中的应用概述,以获得临床见解。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Sep 28;24(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03864-0.
5
Towards a neurodevelopmental model of bipolar disorder: a critical review of trait- and state-related functional neuroimaging in adolescents and young adults.迈向双相情感障碍的神经发育模型:对青少年和青年中与特质及状态相关的功能神经影像学的批判性综述。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;30(3):1089-1101. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02758-4. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Machine learning with multiple modalities of brain magnetic resonance imaging data to identify the presence of bipolar disorder.基于脑磁共振成像多模态数据的机器学习识别双相障碍。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:448-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.025. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
7
Evidence from comprehensive independent validation studies for smooth pursuit dysfunction as a sensorimotor biomarker for psychosis.全面独立验证研究表明,平滑追踪功能障碍是精神病的一种感觉运动生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 15;14(1):13859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64487-6.
8
Dissecting clinical and biological heterogeneity in clinical states of bipolar disorder: a 10-year retrospective study from China.剖析双相情感障碍临床状态中的临床与生物学异质性:一项来自中国的10年回顾性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 21;14:1128862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128862. eCollection 2023.
9
An Overview of Bipolar Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning Approaches: Clinical Opportunities and Challenges.使用机器学习方法进行双相情感障碍诊断概述:临床机遇与挑战
Iran J Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;18(2):237-247. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12372.
10
Machine Learning Prediction of Estimated Risk for Bipolar Disorders Using Hippocampal Subfield and Amygdala Nuclei Volumes.利用海马亚区和杏仁核体积进行双相情感障碍估计风险的机器学习预测
Brain Sci. 2023 May 27;13(6):870. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060870.