U.S. National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, GA 30605.
U.S. National Poultry Research Center, USDA-ARS, Athens, GA 30605.
Poult Sci. 2020 Mar;99(3):1615-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.020. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Before starting a study with many birds, it helps to know the method of chick inoculation. The objective was to compare 3 methods of Salmonella challenge (oral gavage [OR], intracloacal inoculation [IC], and seeder bird [SB]). Day-old broiler chicks (n = 100) were inoculated with 10 colony forming units (CFU) per chick of a marker strain of Salmonella Heidelberg (SH) with each route of inoculation. Chicks (n = 25) inoculated by each route were placed in floor pens on fresh pine shavings litter. For the seeder batch, 5 colonized chicks, each orally gavaged with 10 CFUs, were placed with 20 pen mates. Two weeks after inoculation, 10 birds from each pen and the 5 inoculated seeder birds were euthanized, the ceca were aseptically removed and macerated with a rubber mallet and weighed, and 3 times (w/v) buffered peptone was added and stomached for 60 s. Serial dilutions were made and plated onto Brilliant Green Sulfa plates containing 200 ppm nalidixic acid. Plates were incubated along with the stomached ceca for 24 h at 37°C. If no colonies appeared on the plates, an additional plate was streaked from the preenriched bag and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. In addition to all seeder birds being positive, the number of SH-positive birds out of 20 sampled in each group was 13, 17, and 7 for OR, IC, and SB, respectively. The level of SH per g of ceca and cecal contents was log (SE) 3.0 (0.7), 2.0 (0.4), and 2.6 (0.4) for OR, IC, and SB, respectively. After enrichment, the number of colonized birds out of 20 was 18, 20, and 10 for OR, IC, and SB, respectively. In conclusion, this study suggests that IC is the method to use to ensure most of the challenged birds are colonized. However, if you prefer to have a smaller percentage of the birds colonized with higher levels, then OR might be better.
在开始一项涉及大量鸟类的研究之前,了解雏鸡接种方法很有帮助。本研究旨在比较 3 种沙门氏菌攻毒方法(口服灌胃[OR]、泄殖腔接种[IC]和种鸡[SB])。用 10 个含有海德尔堡沙门氏菌(SH)标记株的集落形成单位(CFU)/只雏鸡对 100 只 1 日龄肉鸡雏鸡进行接种,每种接种途径的接种鸡数量为 25 只。用每种接种途径接种的雏鸡被放置在新鲜的松木屑地板围栏中。对于种鸡批次,5 只经口灌胃接种 10 CFU 的已感染鸡与 20 只同栏鸡一起放置。接种后 2 周,从每个围栏中随机选择 10 只鸡和 5 只接种的种鸡进行安乐死,无菌取出盲肠并使用橡胶槌捣碎和称重,加入 3 次(w/v)缓冲蛋白胨,胃内混合 60 s。进行连续稀释并接种于含有 200 ppm 萘啶酸的亮绿磺胺平板上。平板与胃内容物一起在 37°C 下孵育 24 h。如果平板上没有出现任何菌落,从预增菌袋中额外划线一个平板,在 37°C 下孵育 24 h。除所有种鸡均为阳性外,OR、IC 和 SB 组中 20 只鸡的 SH 阳性鸡数量分别为 13、17 和 7 只。OR、IC 和 SB 组的盲肠内容物和盲肠每克 SH 的 log(SE)分别为 3.0(0.7)、2.0(0.4)和 2.6(0.4)。增菌后,OR、IC 和 SB 组中 20 只鸡的感染鸡数量分别为 18、20 和 10 只。总之,本研究表明,IC 是确保大多数攻毒鸡感染的方法。但是,如果您希望有较低百分比的鸡被更高水平的菌感染,那么 OR 可能更好。