Schneitz C, Hakkinen M
Orion Corporation, P.O.Box 425, 20101 Turku, Finland
Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira, Mustialankatu 3, 00790 Helsinki, Finland.
Poult Sci. 2016 May;95(5):1125-8. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew020. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
The efficacy of the commercial competitive exclusion product Broilact against Campylobacter jejuni was evaluated in broiler chickens in a 5-week pilot-scale study. Newly-hatched broiler chicks were brought from a commercial hatchery. After arrival 50 seeder chicks were challenged orally with approximately 10(3) cfu of C. jejuni, wing marked, and placed back in a delivery box and moved to a separate room. The rest of the chicks (contact chicks) were placed in floor pens, 100 chicks per pen. Birds in two pens were treated orally on the day of hatch with the commercial competitive exclusion (CE) product Broilact, and three pens were left untreated. The following day 10 seeder chicks were introduced into the Broilact treated and untreated control pens. One pen was left both untreated and unchallenged (0-control). Each week the ceca of 10 contact chicks and one seeder chick were examined quantitatively for Campylobacter The treatment prevented or significantly reduced the colonization of the challenge organism in the ceca during the two first weeks; the percentage of colonized birds being 0% after the first week and 30% after the second week in the Broilact treated groups but was 100% in the control groups the entire 5-week rearing period. During the third rearing week the proportion of Campylobacter positive birds started to increase in the treated pens, being 80% after the third week and 95 and 90% after the fourth and fifth rearing weeks, respectively. Similarly the average count of Campylobacter in the cecal contents of the Broilact treated chicks started to increase, the difference between the treated and control chicks being 1.4 logs at the end of the rearing period. Although the protective effect was temporary and occurred only during the first two weeks of the rearing period, the results of this study support the earlier observations that CE flora designed to protect chicks from Salmonella may also reduce Campylobacter colonization of broiler chickens.
在一项为期5周的中试规模研究中,对商品竞争排斥产品Broilact针对空肠弯曲菌在肉鸡中的功效进行了评估。刚孵化出的肉鸡雏鸡从商业孵化场运来。到达后,50只种鸡雏鸡经口接种约10³ cfu的空肠弯曲菌,在翅膀上做标记,放回运输箱并转移到单独的房间。其余的雏鸡(接触雏鸡)被放入地面围栏中,每围栏100只雏鸡。在孵化当天,对两个围栏中的鸡经口给予商业竞争排斥(CE)产品Broilact进行处理,三个围栏不做处理。第二天,将10只种鸡雏鸡引入经Broilact处理和未处理的对照围栏中。一个围栏既不做处理也不进行接种(0对照)。每周对10只接触雏鸡和1只种鸡雏鸡的盲肠进行空肠弯曲菌定量检测。在最初两周内,该处理预防或显著减少了接种菌在盲肠中的定植;在经Broilact处理的组中,第一周后定植鸡的百分比为0%,第二周后为30%,但在整个5周饲养期内,对照组中该比例为100%。在饲养的第三周,经处理围栏中空肠弯曲菌阳性鸡的比例开始增加,第三周后为80%,第四和第五周饲养后分别为95%和90%。同样,经Broilact处理的雏鸡盲肠内容物中空肠弯曲菌的平均计数也开始增加,饲养期结束时,处理组和对照组雏鸡之间的差异为1.4个对数。尽管保护作用是暂时的,且仅在饲养期的前两周出现,但本研究结果支持了早期的观察结果,即旨在保护雏鸡免受沙门氏菌感染的CE菌群也可能减少肉鸡空肠弯曲菌的定植。