Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Department of Medical Mycology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Mycopathologia. 2020 Apr;185(2):357-365. doi: 10.1007/s11046-020-00434-z. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Management of superficial aspergillosis is a major challenge owing to the frequent relapses and treatment failure, which may pose a potential risk, thereby gradually developing resistant species. Therefore, necessitating the development of new antifungals with higher potency should be considered as alternative strategies for efficient management of infections. We aimed to investigate the susceptibility of Aspergillus isolates toward a novel triazole, efinaconazole, in comparison with various classes of antifungal drugs. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M38-A2 guidelines. Efinaconazole exhibited poor activity against mutant A. fumigatus strains, A. niger sensu stricto, and A. tubingensis with GM MIC values of 3.62, 1.62, and 2 μg/ml, respectively; however, surprisingly, it efficiently inhibited the growth of A. terreus sensu stricto, followed by wild-type A. fumigatus and A. flavus with GM MIC values of 0.29, 0.42, and 0.52 μg/ml, respectively. Presumably, efinaconazole is inefficient in aspergillosis treatment due to the low susceptibility of A. niger sensu stricto, A. tubingensis, and mutant A. fumigatus; however, it may be effective in treating superficial aspergillosis caused by wild-type A. fumigatus, A. terreus sensu stricto, and A. flavus. Further studies are needed to determine how these findings may translate into in vivo efficacy.
由于频繁复发和治疗失败,浅部曲霉病的治疗管理是一个重大挑战,这可能带来潜在风险,从而逐渐产生耐药物种。因此,有必要考虑开发具有更高效力的新型抗真菌药物,作为有效管理感染的替代策略。我们旨在研究新型三唑类药物依氟康唑对曲霉属分离株的敏感性,与各种类别的抗真菌药物进行比较。根据临床和实验室标准协会 M38-A2 指南进行抗真菌药敏试验。依氟康唑对突变型烟曲霉菌株、严格意义上的黑曲霉和烟曲霉 tubingensis的活性较差,GM MIC 值分别为 3.62、1.62 和 2μg/ml;然而,令人惊讶的是,它能有效抑制严格意义上的土曲霉和野生型烟曲霉以及黄曲霉的生长,GM MIC 值分别为 0.29、0.42 和 0.52μg/ml。推测依氟康唑在曲霉病治疗中效果不佳,是因为严格意义上的黑曲霉、烟曲霉 tubingensis 和突变型烟曲霉的敏感性较低;然而,它可能对治疗由野生型烟曲霉、严格意义上的土曲霉和黄曲霉引起的浅部曲霉病有效。需要进一步的研究来确定这些发现如何转化为体内疗效。