RobotiX Mentor模拟器用于机器人基本技能的同时效度、表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。
Concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor simulator for robotic basic skills.
作者信息
Alshuaibi Muaath, Perrenot Cyril, Hubert Jacques, Perez Manuela
机构信息
Department of Urology, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Department of Urology, Hospital University, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.
出版信息
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Jun;16(3):e2100. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2100. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
OBJECTIVES
To assess several criteria, such as concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor (RXM) simulator for basic robotic skills and to compare virtual and actual dry lab dome.
METHODS
A prospective study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 using RXM and a da Vinci Si robot. 37 subjects, divided into three groups according to their initial surgical training (expert, intermediate, and novice), were evaluated in terms of six representative exercises of basic robotic specific skills as recommended by the fundamentals of robotic surgery.
RESULTS
There was a correlation between the automatic data from the RXM and the subjective evaluation with the robot. The face and content validity, which were evaluated by the experts, were generally considered high (71.5% and 62.5%, respectively). Three levels (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P = .01) and two levels (P = .001) of experience were clearly identified by the simulator.
CONCLUSION
Our study proves the concurrent validity and confirms the face, content, and construct validity of the RXM.
目的
评估RobotiX Mentor（RXM）模拟器在基础机器人技能方面的几个标准，如同时效度、表面效度、内容效度和结构效度，并比较虚拟和实际干式实验室模拟训练器。
方法
2017年12月至2018年5月进行了一项前瞻性研究，使用RXM和达芬奇Si机器人。根据初始手术训练情况将37名受试者分为三组（专家组、中级组和新手组），按照机器人手术基础所推荐的六项基础机器人特定技能代表性练习对其进行评估。
结果
RXM的自动数据与使用机器人进行的主观评估之间存在相关性。专家评估的表面效度和内容效度总体上被认为较高（分别为71.5%和62.5%）。模拟器明确识别出三个经验水平（方差分析[ANOVA]；P = .01）和两个经验水平（P = .001）。
结论
我们的研究证明了RXM的同时效度，并证实了其表面效度、内容效度和结构效度。
Zotero 插件