Suppr超能文献

增龄性肾清除对利奈唑胺药代动力学的影响:从药代动力学/药效学角度看连续输注的优势。

Impact of augmented renal clearance on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid: Advantages of continuous infusion from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Alava, C/ Olaguibel 29, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

Pharmacokinetics, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Centro de Investigación Lascaray-ikergunea, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.044. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of renal function, in particular the presence of augmented renal clearance (ARC), on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients. The effect of continuous infusion on the probability of therapeutic success from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) perspective was also evaluated.

METHODS

Seventeen patients received linezolid (600 mg every 12 h) as a 30-min infusion and 26 as a continuous infusion (50 mg/h). The PK parameters were calculated and the probability of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) was estimated by Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for different doses administered by intermittent (600 mg every 12 h or 600 mg every 8 h) or continuous infusion (50 mg/h or 75 mg/h).

RESULTS

In patients without ARC, the standard dose was adequate to attain the PK/PD target. However, linezolid clearance was significantly higher in ARC patients, leading to sub-therapeutic concentrations. Continuous infusion (50 mg/h) provided concentrations ≥2 mg/l in 70% of the ARC patients. MCS revealed that concentrations ≥2 mg/l would be reached in >90% of patients receiving 75 mg/h.

CONCLUSIONS

ARC increases linezolid clearance and leads to a high risk of underexposure with the standard dose. Continuous infusion increases the PTA, but an infusion rate of 75 mg/h should be considered to ensure concentrations ≥2 mg/ml.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估肾功能,特别是增强的肾清除率(ARC)对危重症患者利奈唑胺药代动力学的影响。还从药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)的角度评估了连续输注对治疗成功率的影响。

方法

17 名患者接受利奈唑胺(每 12 小时 600mg,30 分钟输注)和 26 名患者接受连续输注(50mg/h)。计算 PK 参数,并通过蒙特卡罗模拟(MCS)评估不同剂量间歇输注(每 12 小时 600mg 或每 8 小时 600mg)或连续输注(50mg/h 或 75mg/h)的 PK/PD 目标达标概率(PTA)。

结果

在没有 ARC 的患者中,标准剂量足以达到 PK/PD 目标。然而,ARC 患者的利奈唑胺清除率明显更高,导致治疗浓度不足。连续输注(50mg/h)可使 70%的 ARC 患者的浓度≥2mg/l。MCS 显示,接受 75mg/h 治疗的患者中,浓度≥2mg/l 的比例将超过 90%。

结论

ARC 增加了利奈唑胺的清除率,导致标准剂量下出现药物暴露不足的风险较高。连续输注增加了 PTA,但应考虑以 75mg/h 的输注率,以确保浓度≥2mg/ml。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验