Suppr超能文献

为患有边缘型人格障碍的人提供结构化心理支持:一项低强度干预的可行性随机对照试验。 (注:原文中“personality disorder”常见释义为“人格障碍”,这里根据语境推测可能是“边缘型人格障碍”,如果原文有误请指出。) 针对人格障碍患者的结构化心理支持:低强度干预的可行性随机对照试验

Structured Psychological Support for people with personality disorder: feasibility randomised controlled trial of a low-intensity intervention.

作者信息

Crawford Mike J, Thana Lavanya, Parker Jennie, Turner Oliver, Carney Aidan, McMurran Mary, Moran Paul, Weaver Timothy, Barrett Barbara, Roberts Sarah, Claringbold Amy, Bassett Paul, Sanatinia Rahil, Spong Amanda

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, Imperial College London, UK.

Research and Development, Central & North West London NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2020 Mar 2;6(2):e25. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National guidance cautions against low-intensity interventions for people with personality disorder, but evidence from trials is lacking.

AIMS

To test the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial of a low-intensity intervention for people with personality disorder.

METHOD

Single-blind, feasibility trial (trial registration: ISRCTN14994755). We recruited people aged 18 or over with a clinical diagnosis of personality disorder from mental health services, excluding those with a coexisting organic or psychotic mental disorder. We randomly allocated participants via a remote system on a 1:1 ratio to six to ten sessions of Structured Psychological Support (SPS) or to treatment as usual. We assessed social functioning, mental health, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care and resource use and costs at baseline and 24 weeks after randomisation.

RESULTS

A total of 63 participants were randomly assigned to either SPS (n = 33) or treatment as usual (n = 30). Twenty-nine (88%) of those in the active arm of the trial received one or more session (median 7). Among 46 (73%) who were followed up at 24 weeks, social dysfunction was lower (-6.3, 95% CI -12.0 to -0.6, P = 0.03) and satisfaction with care was higher (6.5, 95% CI 2.5 to 10.4; P = 0.002) in those allocated to SPS. Statistically significant differences were not found in other outcomes. The cost of the intervention was low and total costs over 24 weeks were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SPS may provide an effective low-intensity intervention for people with personality disorder and should be tested in fully powered clinical trials.

摘要

背景

国家指南告诫不要对人格障碍患者进行低强度干预,但缺乏试验证据。

目的

测试对人格障碍患者进行低强度干预随机试验的可行性。

方法

单盲可行性试验(试验注册号:ISRCTN14994755)。我们从心理健康服务机构招募了18岁及以上临床诊断为人格障碍的患者,排除同时患有器质性或精神病性精神障碍的患者。我们通过远程系统以1:1的比例将参与者随机分配接受6至10次结构化心理支持(SPS)或常规治疗。我们在基线和随机分组后24周评估社会功能、心理健康、健康相关生活质量、护理满意度以及资源使用和成本。

结果

共有63名参与者被随机分配到SPS组(n = 33)或常规治疗组(n = 30)。试验积极组中的29名(88%)接受了一次或更多次治疗(中位数为7次)。在24周时接受随访的46名(73%)参与者中,分配到SPS组的患者社会功能障碍更低(-6.3,95%置信区间-12.0至-0.6,P = 0.03),护理满意度更高(6.5,95%置信区间2.5至10.4;P = 0.002)。在其他结果中未发现统计学上的显著差异。干预成本较低,两组24周的总成本相似。

结论

结构化心理支持可能为患有人格障碍的人提供有效的低强度干预,应在充分有力的临床试验中进行测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a5/7176836/9ab934b6e1ce/S2056472420000071_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验