Amemori Ken-Ichi, Amemori Satoko, Gibson Daniel J, Graybiel Ann M
The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Japan.
McGovern Institute for Brain Research and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2020 Feb 7;14:89. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00089. eCollection 2020.
An approach-avoidance (Ap-Av) conflict arises when an individual has to decide whether to accept or reject a compound offer that has features indicating both reward and punishment. During value judgments of likes and dislikes, arousal responses simultaneously emerge and influence reaction times and the frequency of behavioral errors. In Ap-Av decision-making, reward and punishment differentially influence valence and arousal, allowing us to dissociate their neural processing. The primate caudate nucleus (CN) has been implicated in affective judgment, but it is still unclear how neural responses in the CN represent decision-related variables underlying choice. To address this issue, we recorded spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) from the CN while macaque monkeys performed an Ap-Av decision-making task. We analyzed 450 neuronal units and 667 beta oscillatory activities recorded during the performance of the task. To examine how these activities represented valence, we focused on beta-band responses and unit activities that encoded the chosen value (ChV) of the compound offer as derived from an econometric model. Unit activities exhibited either positive (65.0% = 26/40) or negative (35.0% = 14/40) correlations with the ChV, whereas beta responses exhibited almost exclusively positive correlations with the ChV (98.4% = 62/63). We examined arousal representation by focusing on beta responses and unit activities that encoded the frequency of omission errors (FOE), which were negatively correlated with arousal. The unit activities were either positively (65.3% = 17/26) or negatively (34.6% = 9/26) correlated with the FOE, whereas the beta responses were almost entirely positively correlated with the FOE (95.8% = 23/24). We found that the temporal onset of the beta-band responses occurred sequentially across conditions: first, the negative-value, then low-arousal, and finally, high-value conditions. These findings suggest the distinctive roles of CN beta oscillations that were sequentially activated for the valence and arousal conditions. By identifying dissociable groups of CN beta-band activity responding in relation to valence and arousal, we demonstrate that the beta responses mainly exhibited selective activation for the high-valence and low-arousal conditions, whereas the unit activities simultaneously recorded in the same experiments responded to chosen value and other features of decision-making under approach-avoidance conflict.
当个体必须决定是否接受或拒绝一个具有奖励和惩罚特征的复合提议时,就会出现趋避冲突。在对喜好和厌恶进行价值判断时,唤醒反应会同时出现,并影响反应时间和行为错误的频率。在趋避决策中,奖励和惩罚对效价和唤醒的影响不同,这使我们能够区分它们的神经加工过程。灵长类动物的尾状核(CN)与情感判断有关,但尚不清楚CN中的神经反应如何表征选择背后与决策相关的变量。为了解决这个问题,我们在猕猴执行趋避决策任务时,记录了CN的尖峰信号和局部场电位(LFP)。我们分析了任务执行过程中记录的450个神经元单元和667个β振荡活动。为了研究这些活动如何表征效价,我们关注β波段反应和单元活动,这些活动编码了从计量经济学模型得出的复合提议的选定值(ChV)。单元活动与ChV呈正相关(65.0% = 26/40)或负相关(35.0% = 14/40),而β反应几乎只与ChV呈正相关(98.4% = 62/63)。我们通过关注β反应和单元活动来研究唤醒表征,这些活动编码了遗漏错误频率(FOE),FOE与唤醒呈负相关。单元活动与FOE呈正相关(65.3% = 17/26)或负相关(34.6% = 9/26),而β反应几乎完全与FOE呈正相关(95.8% = 23/24)。我们发现,β波段反应的时间起始在不同条件下依次发生:首先是负值条件,然后是低唤醒条件,最后是高值条件。这些发现表明了CNβ振荡在效价和唤醒条件下依次被激活的独特作用。通过识别与效价和唤醒相关的可分离的CNβ波段活动组,我们证明β反应主要在高价和低唤醒条件下表现出选择性激活,而在同一实验中同时记录的单元活动则对趋避冲突下的选定值和其他决策特征做出反应。