Núñez F Javier, Munguía-Izquierdo Diego, Suárez-Arrones Luis
Physical Performance and Sports Research, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 12;11:16. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00016. eCollection 2020.
The aim of this study was to determine the most effective anthropometric equations or bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices for quantifying the sensitivity to change in fat-free mass (FFM) in elite young soccer players, in comparison with measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), between the pre- and mid-season. A total of 40 elite youth soccer players participated in this study. DXA values provided a criterion measure of FFM. Correlation coefficients, biases, limits of agreement, and differences were used as measures of sensitivity to change. All body density, skinfold, and anthropometric equations and BIA devices used to obtain FFM data showed positive and very large correlations ( from 0.70 to 0.89) with DXA. A significant increase in FFM was shown between time points using DXA, BIA, and all anthropometric equations ( < 0.01). The magnitudes of differences were small for DXA, BIA inbody and all anthropometric equations except those of Faulkner (1966), Durnin and Rahaman (1967), Brook (1971), and Sarría et al. (1998). Six anthropometric equations [Faulkner (1966), Durnin and Womersley (1974), Carter (1982), Slaughter et al. (1988), Reilly et al. (2009), and Munguia-Izquierdo et al. (2018)] and BIA Tanita showed no statistical differences compared to DXA, with a low bias. We concluded that the equations developed by Durnin and Womersley (1974), Carter (1982), Slaughter et al. (1988), Reilly et al. (2009), and Munguia-Izquierdo et al. (2018) showed the best sensitivity in assessing FFM changes between pre- and mid-season in elite youth soccer players.
本研究的目的是确定与使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量相比,在赛季前和赛季中期,用于量化精英年轻足球运动员瘦体重(FFM)变化敏感性的最有效人体测量方程或生物电阻抗分析(BIA)设备。共有40名精英青年足球运动员参与了本研究。DXA值提供了FFM的标准测量值。相关系数、偏差、一致性界限和差异被用作变化敏感性的测量指标。所有用于获取FFM数据的身体密度、皮褶厚度和人体测量方程以及BIA设备与DXA均显示出正相关且相关性非常大(范围从0.70至0.89)。使用DXA、BIA和所有人体测量方程在各时间点之间显示出FFM有显著增加(<0.01)。除了福克纳(1966年)、达宁和拉哈曼(1967年)、布鲁克(1971年)以及萨里亚等人(1998年)的方程外,DXA、BIA体内测量法和所有人体测量方程的差异幅度都很小。六个人体测量方程[福克纳(1966年)、达宁和沃默斯利(1974年)、卡特(1982年)、斯劳特等人(1988年)、赖利等人(2009年)以及蒙吉亚 - 伊兹基尔多等人(2018年)]和BIA百利达与DXA相比无统计学差异,偏差较低。我们得出结论,达宁和沃默斯利(1974年)、卡特(1982年)、斯劳特等人(1988年)、赖利等人(2009年)以及蒙吉亚 - 伊兹基尔多等人(2018年)所开发的方程在评估精英青年足球运动员赛季前和赛季中期FFM变化方面显示出最佳敏感性。