• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠康复患者体内病毒 RNA 的持续存在与清除。

Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China.

Department of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 May 5;133(9):1039-1043. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000774.

DOI:10.1097/CM9.0000000000000774
PMID:32118639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7147278/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A patient's infectivity is determined by the presence of the virus in different body fluids, secretions, and excreta. The persistence and clearance of viral RNA from different specimens of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remain unclear. This study analyzed the clearance time and factors influencing 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) RNA in different samples from patients with COVID-19, providing further evidence to improve the management of patients during convalescence.

METHODS

The clinical data and laboratory test results of convalescent patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to from January 20, 2020 to February 10, 2020 were collected retrospectively. The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results for patients' oropharyngeal swab, stool, urine, and serum samples were collected and analyzed. Convalescent patients refer to recovered non-febrile patients without respiratory symptoms who had two successive (minimum 24 h sampling interval) negative RT-PCR results for viral RNA from oropharyngeal swabs. The effects of cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4)+ T lymphocytes, inflammatory indicators, and glucocorticoid treatment on viral nucleic acid clearance were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the 292 confirmed cases, 66 patients recovered after treatment and were included in our study. In total, 28 (42.4%) women and 38 men (57.6%) with a median age of 44.0 (34.0-62.0) years were analyzed. After in-hospital treatment, patients' inflammatory indicators decreased with improved clinical condition. The median time from the onset of symptoms to first negative RT-PCR results for oropharyngeal swabs in convalescent patients was 9.5 (6.0-11.0) days. By February 10, 2020, 11 convalescent patients (16.7%) still tested positive for viral RNA from stool specimens and the other 55 patients' stool specimens were negative for 2019-nCoV following a median duration of 11.0 (9.0-16.0) days after symptom onset. Among these 55 patients, 43 had a longer duration until stool specimens were negative for viral RNA than for throat swabs, with a median delay of 2.0 (1.0-4.0) days. Results for only four (6.9%) urine samples were positive for viral nucleic acid out of 58 cases; viral RNA was still present in three patients' urine specimens after throat swabs were negative. Using a multiple linear regression model (F = 2.669, P = 0.044, and adjusted R = 0.122), the analysis showed that the CD4+ T lymphocyte count may help predict the duration of viral RNA detection in patients' stools (t = -2.699, P = 0.010). The duration of viral RNA detection from oropharyngeal swabs and fecal samples in the glucocorticoid treatment group was longer than that in the non-glucocorticoid treatment group (15 days vs. 8.0 days, respectively; t = 2.550, P = 0.013) and the duration of viral RNA detection in fecal samples in the glucocorticoid treatment group was longer than that in the non-glucocorticoid treatment group (20 days vs. 11 days, respectively; t = 4.631, P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in inflammatory indicators between patients with positive fecal viral RNA test results and those with negative results (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In brief, as the clearance of viral RNA in patients' stools was delayed compared to that in oropharyngeal swabs, it is important to identify viral RNA in feces during convalescence. Because of the delayed clearance of viral RNA in the glucocorticoid treatment group, glucocorticoids are not recommended in the treatment of COVID-19, especially for mild disease. The duration of RNA detection may relate to host cell immunity.

摘要

背景

患者的传染性取决于其不同体液、分泌物和排泄物中病毒的存在情况。对于 2019 年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者,不同标本中病毒 RNA 的持续时间和清除情况仍不清楚。本研究分析了 COVID-19 患者不同样本中 2019 年新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)RNA 的清除时间及其影响因素,为改善患者恢复期的管理提供了进一步的证据。

方法

回顾性收集 2020 年 1 月 20 日至 2 月 10 日收治的 COVID-19 恢复期患者的临床数据和实验室检测结果。收集并分析患者咽拭子、粪便、尿液和血清样本的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)结果。恢复期患者指的是体温正常、无呼吸道症状且连续 2 次(采样间隔至少 24 小时)咽拭子 RT-PCR 病毒 RNA 结果均为阴性的非发热患者。分析了 CD4+T 淋巴细胞、炎症指标和糖皮质激素治疗对病毒核酸清除的影响。

结果

在 292 例确诊病例中,66 例经治疗后康复并纳入本研究。共有 28 名(42.4%)女性和 38 名(57.6%)男性,中位年龄为 44.0(34.0-62.0)岁。住院治疗后,患者的炎症指标随着临床状况的改善而降低。恢复期患者咽拭子首次 RT-PCR 结果为阴性的中位时间为 9.5(6.0-11.0)天。到 2020 年 2 月 10 日,仍有 11 例恢复期患者(16.7%)粪便标本检测到病毒 RNA 阳性,其余 55 例患者的粪便标本在症状出现后中位时间 11.0(9.0-16.0)天内均检测不到 2019-nCoV。在这 55 例患者中,有 43 例患者粪便标本病毒 RNA 转为阴性的时间长于咽拭子,中位延迟时间为 2.0(1.0-4.0)天。58 例尿液样本中仅有 4 例(6.9%)病毒核酸检测结果为阳性,在咽拭子转为阴性后,仍有 3 例患者的尿液标本中存在病毒 RNA。使用多元线性回归模型(F = 2.669,P = 0.044,调整 R = 0.122)分析表明,CD4+T 淋巴细胞计数可能有助于预测患者粪便中病毒 RNA 检测的持续时间(t = -2.699,P = 0.010)。糖皮质激素治疗组的咽拭子和粪便样本中病毒 RNA 检测持续时间长于非糖皮质激素治疗组(分别为 15 天和 8.0 天;t = 2.550,P = 0.013),糖皮质激素治疗组的粪便样本中病毒 RNA 检测持续时间长于非糖皮质激素治疗组(分别为 20 天和 11 天;t = 4.631,P < 0.001)。粪便病毒 RNA 检测结果阳性患者与阴性患者的炎症指标无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。

结论

简而言之,由于患者粪便中病毒 RNA 的清除时间比咽拭子中延迟,因此在恢复期识别粪便中的病毒 RNA 很重要。由于糖皮质激素治疗组病毒 RNA 清除延迟,不建议在 COVID-19 的治疗中使用糖皮质激素,特别是对于轻症患者。RNA 检测持续时间可能与宿主细胞免疫有关。

相似文献

1
Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients.新冠康复患者体内病毒 RNA 的持续存在与清除。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 May 5;133(9):1039-1043. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000774.
2
Detection and analysis of nucleic acid in various biological samples of COVID-19 patients.检测和分析 COVID-19 患者各种生物样本中的核酸。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101673. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101673. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
3
The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients.SARS-CoV-2 RNA 存在于 COVID-19 患者的粪便中。
J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):833-840. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25825. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
4
Fecal viral shedding in COVID-19 patients: Clinical significance, viral load dynamics and survival analysis.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者粪便中的病毒脱落:临床意义、病毒载量动态和生存分析。
Virus Res. 2020 Nov;289:198147. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198147. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Comparison of throat swabs and sputum specimens for viral nucleic acid detection in 52 cases of novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19).比较 52 例新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)感染性肺炎(COVID-19)患者的咽拭子和痰标本用于病毒核酸检测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1089-1094. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0187.
6
Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.拭子类型和采集时间对 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-COV-2 的影响。
J Virol Methods. 2020 Dec;286:113974. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113974. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding in clinical specimens and clinical characteristics of 10 patients with COVID-19 in Macau.评估 SARS-CoV-2 在临床标本中的 RNA 释放情况,以及澳门 10 例 COVID-19 患者的临床特征。
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;16(10):1698-1707. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.45357. eCollection 2020.
8
Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study.诱导痰检测的可靠性大于咽拭子检测,可用于检测 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2:一项多中心横断面研究。
Virulence. 2020 Dec;11(1):1394-1401. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1831342.
9
Utility of Stool PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Comparison of Two Commercial Platforms.粪便 PCR 检测在 COVID-19 诊断中的应用:两种商业平台的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01369-20.
10
Prospective Study Comparing Deep Throat Saliva With Other Respiratory Tract Specimens in the Diagnosis of Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.前瞻性研究比较深喉唾液与其他呼吸道标本在新型冠状病毒病 2019 诊断中的应用。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 13;222(10):1612-1619. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa487.

引用本文的文献

1
Fecal and Environmental Shedding of Influenza A Virus in Brazilian Swine: Genomic Evidence of Recent Human-to-Swine Transmission.巴西猪群中甲型流感病毒的粪便及环境传播:近期人传猪的基因组学证据
Pathogens. 2025 Jul 31;14(8):753. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14080753.
2
2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection: Gastrointestinal Manifestations.2019新型冠状病毒感染:胃肠道表现
J Dig Endosc. 2020 Mar;11(1):13-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712077. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Nutraceuticals and pharmacological to balance the transitional microbiome to extend immunity during COVID-19 and other viral infections.营养保健品和药理学可以平衡过渡微生物组,在 COVID-19 和其他病毒感染期间增强免疫力。
J Transl Med. 2024 Sep 18;22(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05587-9.
4
Association of pulmonary function test abnormalities and quality-of-life measures after COVID-19 infection.新冠肺炎感染后肺功能测试异常与生活质量评估之间的关联。
Am J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;368(2):112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
ANMCO POSITION PAPER: Network Organization for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients during the Emergency COVID-19 Pandemic.意大利心脏病学国家协会立场文件:2019年冠状病毒病疫情紧急期间急性冠状动脉综合征患者的网络治疗组织
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2020 Aug;22(Suppl G):G223-G227. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa111. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
[Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19, a review of the evidence and implications for pandemic management].[新型冠状病毒肺炎中的嗅觉功能障碍:证据综述及其对大流行管理的影响]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2020 Nov-Dec;71(6):379-385. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Replication Persists in the Human Lung for Several Weeks after Symptom Onset.SARS-CoV-2 病毒复制在症状出现后数周内在人体肺部持续存在。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr 1;209(7):840-851. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1438OC.
8
Successful treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in an immunocompromised patient with persistent infection for 245 days: A case report.一名免疫功能低下患者持续感染245天的新型冠状病毒肺炎成功治疗:病例报告
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 14;10(1):e23699. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23699. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
9
A Bayesian framework for modeling COVID-19 case numbers through longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater.一种通过对废水中 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 进行纵向监测来对 COVID-19 病例数量进行建模的贝叶斯框架。
Stat Med. 2024 Mar 15;43(6):1153-1169. doi: 10.1002/sim.10009. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
10
Symmetrical peripheral gangrene: potential mechanisms and therapeutic approaches in severe COVID-19.对称性周围坏疽:重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在机制及治疗方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 29;10:1280625. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1280625. eCollection 2023.