• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种无菌手术皮肤标记物,以指示献血环境中静脉穿刺的最佳静脉。

Evaluation of a sterile surgical skin marker to indicate the optimal vein for venepuncture in the blood donation setting.

机构信息

Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Sydney, Australia.

Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2020 Jul;115(5):377-387. doi: 10.1111/vox.12904. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1111/vox.12904
PMID:32124456
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Phlebotomy is a central task for blood donation; however, not all blood donors have veins that are easy to see or feel. This study aimed to determine whether use of a surgical skin marker to highlight the donors' vein location and direction prior to venepuncture increased blood donation success.

METHODS

All blood donors who participated in this study were eligible to donate according to Australian guidelines. Ten donor centres with phlebotomy success rates <95% were selected. A randomized cluster trial design assigned five sites to test the skin marking device and five sites as controls. Single-use sterile Gentian violet skin marker pens were used to mark donors' veins. Phlebotomy site skin bacterial load after using the skin marking device was tested on a subset of 100 donors. Phlebotomy success rates and donor adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the control donors, 6993 had successful phlebotomies and 225 failed. Of the skin marker donors, 6998 had successful phlebotomies and 248 failed. No statistically significant differences in phlebotomy success were found between the two groups (OR: 0·91, 96·4% CI [96·0, 96·8], P-value 0·348).

CONCLUSION

The use of skin marker pens did not increase overall phlebotomy success rate. There was no increase in phlebotomy site skin bacterial load, and amendments to standard skin disinfection techniques were not required. Blood donors were not concerned about the pen mark on their arms. Generally, staff indicated that the markers may be valuable to assist with phlebotomies for donors with difficult or deep veins.

摘要

背景与目的

采血是献血的核心任务;然而,并非所有献血者的血管都易于看到或摸到。本研究旨在确定在静脉穿刺前使用手术皮肤标记笔突出供者的血管位置和方向是否会提高献血成功率。

方法

所有符合澳大利亚指南的献血者都有资格参加本研究。选择了 10 个静脉穿刺成功率<95%的献血中心。采用随机聚类试验设计,将 5 个地点分配给皮肤标记设备进行测试,5 个地点作为对照。使用一次性无菌龙胆紫皮肤标记笔标记供者的静脉。在 100 名献血者中抽取了一部分进行皮肤标记装置使用后采血部位皮肤细菌负荷检测。记录静脉穿刺成功率和献血者不良事件。

结果

对照组 6993 次静脉穿刺成功,225 次失败;皮肤标记组 6998 次静脉穿刺成功,248 次失败。两组静脉穿刺成功率无统计学差异(比值比:0.91,96.4%置信区间[96.0,96.8],P 值 0.348)。

结论

皮肤标记笔的使用并未提高整体静脉穿刺成功率。静脉穿刺部位皮肤细菌负荷无增加,无需修改标准皮肤消毒技术。献血者对手臂上的标记笔不介意。一般来说,工作人员表示标记笔可能对协助静脉穿刺有困难或深静脉的献血者有价值。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a sterile surgical skin marker to indicate the optimal vein for venepuncture in the blood donation setting.评估一种无菌手术皮肤标记物,以指示献血环境中静脉穿刺的最佳静脉。
Vox Sang. 2020 Jul;115(5):377-387. doi: 10.1111/vox.12904. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Evaluation of a tool to score donor vein suitability for blood donation.评估一种用于评估献血者静脉适合献血的工具。
Vox Sang. 2019 Aug;114(6):588-594. doi: 10.1111/vox.12820. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Determining the effect of vein visualization technology on donation success, vasovagal symptoms, anxiety and intention to re-donate in whole blood donors aged 18-30 years: A randomized controlled trial.确定静脉可视化技术对18至30岁全血捐献者的捐献成功率、血管迷走神经症状、焦虑及再次捐献意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Vox Sang. 2016 Aug;111(2):135-43. doi: 10.1111/vox.12407. Epub 2016 May 11.
4
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
5
Ensuring donor safety: is venesecting therapeutic donors to haemoglobin levels below Blood Service guidelines safe?确保供者安全:将治疗性献血者的血红蛋白水平降至低于血库指南安全吗?
Vox Sang. 2020 May;115(4):288-292. doi: 10.1111/vox.12900. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Evaluation of a scoring system for vein suitability in platelet apheresis donors.血小板单采供者静脉适宜性评分系统的评估
J Clin Apher. 2024 Feb;39(1):e22106. doi: 10.1002/jca.22106.
7
Pen Torch Transillumination: Difficult Venepuncture Made Easy.笔式手电筒透照法:让困难的静脉穿刺变得轻松。
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2401-2408. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4050-3.
8
Improving the donation experience and reducing venipuncture pain by addressing fears among whole-blood and plasma donors.通过解决全血和血浆供者的恐惧,改善捐献体验并减轻静脉穿刺疼痛。
Transfusion. 2021 Jul;61(7):2107-2115. doi: 10.1111/trf.16407. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
Skin plugs in phlebotomy puncture for blood donation.献血时静脉穿刺处的皮肤栓子。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005 Feb;117(4):141-4. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0310-6.
10
Adopting a vein assessment tool improves procedural outcomes in double dose platelet collections - A prospective study.采用静脉评估工具可改善双倍剂量血小板采集的操作结果——一项前瞻性研究。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2021 Oct;60(5):103198. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103198. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Intelligent Operating Hole Towel in Cataract Patients.智能操作孔巾在白内障患者中的应用效果。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;2022:2638428. doi: 10.1155/2022/2638428. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of the disinfection effect of iodophor at two different temperatures on the skin of surgical field and its influence on blood pressure and heart rate of patients.两种不同温度下碘伏对手术野皮肤的消毒效果比较及其对患者血压和心率的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1339-1346. eCollection 2022.