Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Sydney, Australia.
Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Melbourne, Australia.
Vox Sang. 2020 Jul;115(5):377-387. doi: 10.1111/vox.12904. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Phlebotomy is a central task for blood donation; however, not all blood donors have veins that are easy to see or feel. This study aimed to determine whether use of a surgical skin marker to highlight the donors' vein location and direction prior to venepuncture increased blood donation success.
All blood donors who participated in this study were eligible to donate according to Australian guidelines. Ten donor centres with phlebotomy success rates <95% were selected. A randomized cluster trial design assigned five sites to test the skin marking device and five sites as controls. Single-use sterile Gentian violet skin marker pens were used to mark donors' veins. Phlebotomy site skin bacterial load after using the skin marking device was tested on a subset of 100 donors. Phlebotomy success rates and donor adverse events were recorded.
Of the control donors, 6993 had successful phlebotomies and 225 failed. Of the skin marker donors, 6998 had successful phlebotomies and 248 failed. No statistically significant differences in phlebotomy success were found between the two groups (OR: 0·91, 96·4% CI [96·0, 96·8], P-value 0·348).
The use of skin marker pens did not increase overall phlebotomy success rate. There was no increase in phlebotomy site skin bacterial load, and amendments to standard skin disinfection techniques were not required. Blood donors were not concerned about the pen mark on their arms. Generally, staff indicated that the markers may be valuable to assist with phlebotomies for donors with difficult or deep veins.
采血是献血的核心任务;然而,并非所有献血者的血管都易于看到或摸到。本研究旨在确定在静脉穿刺前使用手术皮肤标记笔突出供者的血管位置和方向是否会提高献血成功率。
所有符合澳大利亚指南的献血者都有资格参加本研究。选择了 10 个静脉穿刺成功率<95%的献血中心。采用随机聚类试验设计,将 5 个地点分配给皮肤标记设备进行测试,5 个地点作为对照。使用一次性无菌龙胆紫皮肤标记笔标记供者的静脉。在 100 名献血者中抽取了一部分进行皮肤标记装置使用后采血部位皮肤细菌负荷检测。记录静脉穿刺成功率和献血者不良事件。
对照组 6993 次静脉穿刺成功,225 次失败;皮肤标记组 6998 次静脉穿刺成功,248 次失败。两组静脉穿刺成功率无统计学差异(比值比:0.91,96.4%置信区间[96.0,96.8],P 值 0.348)。
皮肤标记笔的使用并未提高整体静脉穿刺成功率。静脉穿刺部位皮肤细菌负荷无增加,无需修改标准皮肤消毒技术。献血者对手臂上的标记笔不介意。一般来说,工作人员表示标记笔可能对协助静脉穿刺有困难或深静脉的献血者有价值。