• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偶然的预测关系绑定。

Incidental binding between predictive relations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104238. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104238
PMID:32126381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7152562/
Abstract

Knowledge of predictive relations is a core aspect of learning. Beyond individual relations, we also represent intuitive theories of the world, which include interrelated sets of relations. We asked whether individual predictive relations learned incidentally in the same context become associatively bound and whether they spontaneously influence later learning. Participants performed a cover task while watching three sequences of events. Each sequence contained the same set of events, but differed in how the events related to each other. The first two sequences each had two strong predictive relations (R1 & R2, and R3 & R4). The third contained either a consistent pairing of relations (R1 & R2) or an inconsistent pairing (R1 & R3). We found that participants' learning of the individual relations in the third sequence was affected by pairing consistency, suggesting the mind associates relations to each other as part of the intrinsic way it learns about the world. This was despite participants' minimal ability to verbally describe most of the relations they had learned. Thus, participants spontaneously developed the expectation that pairs of relations should cohere, and this affected their ability to learn new evidence. Such associative binding of relational information may help us build intuitive theories.

摘要

知识的预测关系是学习的核心方面。除了个体关系,我们还代表了对世界的直观理论,其中包括相互关联的关系集。我们想知道在相同的背景下偶然学习到的个体预测关系是否会发生联想绑定,以及它们是否会自发地影响以后的学习。参与者在观看三个事件序列的同时执行覆盖任务。每个序列都包含相同的事件集,但事件之间的关系不同。前两个序列各有两个强预测关系(R1 和 R2,以及 R3 和 R4)。第三个序列包含一致的关系对(R1 和 R2)或不一致的关系对(R1 和 R3)。我们发现,参与者对第三个序列中个体关系的学习受到配对一致性的影响,这表明大脑将关系彼此关联,作为其学习世界的固有方式的一部分。尽管参与者几乎无法用言语描述他们所学的大部分关系,但这一点成立。因此,参与者自发地产生了这样的期望,即关系对应该一致,这影响了他们学习新证据的能力。这种关系信息的联想绑定可能有助于我们构建直观的理论。

相似文献

1
Incidental binding between predictive relations.偶然的预测关系绑定。
Cognition. 2020 Jun;199:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104238. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
Neural correlates of cue predictiveness during intentional and incidental associative learning: A time-frequency study.意图性和偶然联想学习过程中线索预测性的神经相关:时频研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Sep;143:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.测试人类联想学习中对预测线索的注意偏向的自动性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):762-780. doi: 10.1177/1747021819897590. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
4
Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.分解经验驱动的注意力:先前预测性线索的相反注意力效应。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2185-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1101-z.
5
Guidance of spatial attention during associative learning: Contributions of predictability and intention to learn.在联想学习过程中对空间注意力的引导:可预测性和学习意图的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Aug;55(8):e13077. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13077. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T.正常乳腺的弥散张量磁共振成像:3.0T 下 DTI 衍生的各向异性分数和表观扩散系数的可重复性。
Radiol Med. 2012 Sep;117(6):992-1003. doi: 10.1007/s11547-012-0831-9. Epub 2012 May 14.
7
Can We Set Aside Previous Experience in a Familiar Causal Scenario?在熟悉的因果场景中,我们能否抛开以往的经验?
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:578775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578775. eCollection 2020.
8
To what extent does the existence of functional relations in a learning setting change the pattern of differences between younger and older adults' performances?在学习环境中,功能关系的存在在多大程度上改变了年轻人和老年人表现之间的差异模式?
Exp Aging Res. 2014;40(4):455-76. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.926776.
9
The effect of prediction error on overt attention and learning in humans.预测误差对人类显性注意力和学习的影响。
Behav Processes. 2023 Mar;206:104843. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104843. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Aging and the role of attention in associative learning.衰老与注意在联想学习中的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2019 Mar;34(2):215-227. doi: 10.1037/pag0000277. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal and Chronological Relationships Predict Memory Organization for Nonlinear Narratives.因果关系和时间顺序关系预测非线性叙事的记忆组织。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Nov 1;36(11):2368-2385. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02216.

本文引用的文献

1
The Cost of Structure Learning.结构学习的代价。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;29(10):1646-1655. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01128. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
2
Context-dependent learning and causal structure.情境依赖学习与因果结构
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):557-565. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1110-x.
3
Neural signature of hierarchically structured expectations predicts clustering and transfer of rule sets in reinforcement learning.层次结构期望的神经特征预测强化学习中规则集的聚类和迁移。
Cognition. 2016 Jul;152:160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
4
Abstract Context Representations in Primate Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex.灵长类动物杏仁核和前额叶皮质中的抽象情境表征
Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):869-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.024.
5
8-month-old infants spontaneously learn and generalize hierarchical rules.8个月大的婴儿能自发学习并归纳分层规则。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):805-15. doi: 10.1177/0956797615571442. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
The effects of relational structure on analogical learning.关系结构对类比学习的影响。
Cognition. 2014 Sep;132(3):280-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 21.
7
The functions of contexts in associative learning.关联学习中情境的功能。
Behav Processes. 2014 May;104:2-12. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Cognitive control over learning: creating, clustering, and generalizing task-set structure.认知控制学习:创建、聚类和泛化任务集结构。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):190-229. doi: 10.1037/a0030852.
9
Exploring a latent cause theory of classical conditioning.探索经典条件作用的潜在原因理论。
Learn Behav. 2012 Sep;40(3):255-68. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0080-8.
10
Artificial grammar learning meets formal language theory: an overview.人工语法学习与形式语言理论的交汇:概述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Jul 19;367(1598):1933-55. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0103.