Yahia Amar, Miskeen Elhadi, Sohail Shahzada K, Algak Tarig, Aljadran Saad
Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, SAU.
Cureus. 2020 Feb 19;12(2):e7044. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7044.
Background Rhesus D (RhD) antigen alloimmunization has been a focus of concern for hematologists and obstetricians. It contributes to perinatal morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to assess the awareness of pregnant women toward the clinical importance of blood group Rh(D)-negativity and anti-D immunoglobulin and to determine the prevalence of blood group Rh(D)-negativity among them. Methods and materials This cross-sectional study was conducted in a routine antenatal care clinic of King Abdullah Hospital in Bisha, Saudi Arabia from September 2018 to January 2019. The awareness of pregnant women toward the clinical importance of blood group Rh(D)-negativity and prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire. Samples were analyzed for ABO and Rh (D) blood groups using the microplate grouping method. The presence of anti-D alloantibodies was detected by the indirect antiglobulin test. Data were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 108 respondents fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Forty-five pregnant women (41.7%) were observed to be aware of the blood group Rh(D)-negativity and anti-D immunoglobulin issue. The prevalence of the negative blood group was 11.1% (12/108). Awareness was found to be significantly associated with age, education, vaginal bleeding, blood groups, and previous administration of anti-D immunoglobulin (p-value ≤0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of blood group Rh(D)-negativity among respondents was found to be comparative with other populations, although the overall awareness was found to be suboptimal (41.7%). Structured health education programs by hematologists and obstetricians are needed to increase awareness and to address women at reproductive age.
背景 恒河猴D(RhD)抗原同种免疫一直是血液学家和产科医生关注的焦点。它会导致围产期发病和死亡。本研究的目的是评估孕妇对Rh(D)阴性血型和抗-D免疫球蛋白临床重要性的知晓情况,并确定她们中Rh(D)阴性血型的患病率。
方法和材料 本横断面研究于2018年9月至2019年1月在沙特阿拉伯比沙阿卜杜拉国王医院的常规产前保健诊所进行。通过自行填写的问卷评估孕妇对Rh(D)阴性血型的临床重要性以及抗-D免疫球蛋白预防作用的知晓情况。使用微孔板分组法分析样本的ABO和Rh(D)血型。通过间接抗球蛋白试验检测抗-D同种抗体的存在。数据采用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 25.0版(纽约州阿蒙克:IBM公司)进行分析。p值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
结果 共有108名受访者符合纳入标准并完成了调查。观察到45名孕妇(41.7%)知晓Rh(D)阴性血型和抗-D免疫球蛋白问题。阴性血型的患病率为11.1%(12/108)。发现知晓情况与年龄、教育程度、阴道出血、血型以及既往抗-D免疫球蛋白的使用显著相关(p值≤0.05)。
结论 尽管总体知晓情况不理想(41.7%),但发现受访者中Rh(D)阴性血型的患病率与其他人群相当。血液学家和产科医生需要开展结构化的健康教育项目,以提高知晓率并关注育龄妇女。